• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Trademark

Northwest Indiana Jewelry Stores Clash over Diamond Logos

03 Friday Feb 2023

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Indiana Trademark Infringement, Joshua P. Kolar, Philip P. Simon

Since 1905, Albert’s Diamond Jewelers has been selling diamond jewelry in Northwest Indiana. In 2002, they adopted the logo seen below when they moved to their current location in Schererville, Indiana. Their logo has not been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The logo is described as follows: “The mark prominently incorporates a diamond drawing with sharp edges and a multitude of internal sketch lines, all intended to evoke in a potential customer’s mind a precision cut, high-quality diamond. It’s name “Albert’s” appears above the term “Diamond Jewelers,” and incorporates a distinct style of typeface/font….” See Complaint (below), Section 13.

AaLand Diamond Jewelers recently opened a new location in Crown Point, Indiana, which is about 9 miles away from Schererville. AaLand has adopted a logo that Albert’s considers to be “suspiciously similar” to the 21-year old Albert’s logo.

Albert’s reached out to AaLand in late 2022 about their concern, but the parties have not found an amicable resolution. Albert’s initial letter, via counsel, references a single instance of consumer confusion in which an anonymous customer congratulated Albert’s on opening a new store. Albert’s has now filed a lawsuit seeking Court intervention.

I’ll let defense counsel do their job and dig up tons of other photos of similar jewelry store logos, but I can at least compare the parties’ respective logos.

In my opinion, the distinctive elements of the Albert’s font are the swooping, extended arm (leg?) of the “A” and the diamond-shaped asterisk. Neither of those elements appear in the AaLand logo. I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the AaLand font is just a standard, stock font. Font experts leave a comment below. Albert’s utilizes all capitalized letters, while AaLand features the lower case “a”.

Looking at the two diamonds, they are clearly not identical. They both appear just like what you’d expect a diamond logo to look like, basically what you see on most jewelry store signs. Both are the classic diamond-shape outline with many internal lines depicting facets, just like a diamond. Jewelry experts (and eventually defense counsel) may be able to identify the differences in cuts portrayed on the logos.

Both logos incorporate the generic phrase “Diamond Jewelers,” but the Albert’s logo separates their name from the generic phrase with lines both above and below. The generic phrase is about 5/7 the width of the Albert’s name. The AaLand name is the same width as the generic phrase and separated by one line, which is also the same width as the wording.

If these two jewelry stores weren’t 9 miles apart, would there be any problem? Does close proximity (9 miles) override the ability to use generic elements in your logo? AaLand apparently doesn’t think so based off just one anonymous instance of consumer confusion.

Stay tuned for AaLand’s response to Albert’s Complaint.

Albert’s Diamond Jewelers, Inc. v. AaLand Diamond Jewelers LLC

Court Case Number: 2-23-cv-00039-PPS-JPK
File Date: February 1, 2023
Plaintiff: Albert’s Diamond Jewelers, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Gary E. Hood of Hood Legal Group PC, Daniel W. Glavin of O’Neill McFadden & Willett LLP
Defendants: AaLand Diamond Jewelers LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Federal Unfair Competition, Indiana Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Philip P. Simon
Referred To: Joshua P. Kolar

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

January 2023 Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Update

17 Tuesday Jan 2023

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

As usual, there was not much action over the holiday period in Indiana copyright and trademark lawsuits. The big surprise of the last month was a Notice of Settlement filed in the Omi in a Hellcat “Reloaded” lawsuit on December 23, 2022. Terms of settlement have not been made public and we’re still awaiting the dismissal documents, but it seems to have come rather abruptly considering recent filings.

The next few months should be busier as new judges take over existing lawsuits. Stay tuned for updates.

Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC v. Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/4/2021) – Plaintiff’s deadline to serve final witness and exhibit lists has been extended to January 20, 2023.

Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. AMI Stores Management, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/6/2021) –  Noble Roman’s filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on December 21, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc. (ND, filed 8/31/2021) – The parties filed a Joint Status Report with several updates.

View this document on Scribd

Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 9/24/2021) – The Defendants filed an Answer on January 11, 2023, after receiving leave to file after their deadline. The parties held a status conference with the Court on January 12, 2023 and another is scheduled on February 8, 2023.

Edutainment Live, LLC v. Video Game Palooza et al. (SD, filed 10/11/2021) –  No update this month.

Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. La Jalisco LLP (SD, filed 12/15/2021) –  A default judgment was entered on December 15, 2022. In total, the Plaintiff was awarded $42,000.48.

Gabet et al. v. Amazon.com. Inc. et al. (ND, filed 1/20/2022) – A settlement conference is scheduled for August 31, 2023.

Reid v. Stephenson (SD, filed 1/27/2022) – A telephonic status conference was scheduled for January 24, 2023 but the case was subsequently assigned to Magistrate Judge M. Kendra Klump. The new case number is 1:22-cv-00205-JRS-MKK.

NuStar Enterprises LLC v. Reloaded Merch LLC et al. (ND, filed 4/1/2022) – A joint Notice of Settlement was filed on December 23, 2022. The plaintiff was given 30 days to file dismissal documents.

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. v. Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) –  A video motion hearing is scheduled for February 10, 2023, to discuss Defendant Bartel’s pending motions.

PUMA SE et al. v. Brooks Sports, Inc. (SD, filed 7/8/2022) – The Court entered a Uniform Stipulated Protective Order on December 19, 2022. No other updates.

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thirty-Six Saloon, LLC d/b/a Thirty Six Saloon et al. (SD, filed 7/27/2022) – No update this month.

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/5/2022) – A telephonic status conference was held on January 9, 2023. A settlement conference will be schedule by separate order.

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/11/2022) – Plaintiff has been authorized to file a motion to compel Defendants’ tax returns. A telephonic status conference is set for February 3, 2023.

Honest Abe Roofing franchise, Inc. v. DCH & Associates, LLC et al. (SD, filed 9/7/2022) – On December 7, 2022, a Clerk’s Entry of Default was entered against Defendants Christine Harris, Dameion Harris, and Honest Abe Roofing of Macon Georgia, LLC. On January 11, 2023, the Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default against Defendant DCH & Associates, LLC was denied for lack of proper service.

Phoenix USA RV, Inc. v. Hoosier Custom Cruisers LLC et al. (ND, removed 10/7/2022) – No update this month.

MaddenCo Inc. v. Reed et al. (SD, filed 10/31/2022) – On December 27, 2022, the Plaintiff filed its Response to Defendant Reed’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.

View this document on Scribd

After receiving an extension of time, Defendant Reed’s Reply was filed on January 10, 2023.

View this document on Scribd

The Center for Gestalt Development, Inc. v. Bowman (SD (11/09/2022) – On January 13, 2023, Defendant Bowman filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Venue.

View this document on Scribd

1.4G Holdings, LLC v. North Central Industries, Inc. et al. (SD 1/05/2023) – No update yet.

December 2022 Updates –  December 2021 Updates

Fireworks involved in first Indiana Trademark Lawsuit of 2023

10 Tuesday Jan 2023

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Mario Garcia, Misappropriation, Tanya Walton Pratt, Trade Dress Infringement

Happy New Year! It didn’t take long to get the first Indiana trademark (and trade dress) lawsuit of 2023, and in continuation of the festive celebrations, it involves fireworks.

The Defendants are alleged to be selling fireworks that infringe the Plaintiff’s registered TIKI, GHOST, and XL trademarks, as well as a “Tiki Trade Dress”.

The parties seem to be all major players in the fireworks industry, so they likely have some history. The Plaintiff has registered trademarks and it seems that the Defendants introduced new competing products utilizing similar marks after the registration date. As always, the Defendants’ Answer may tell another side of the story so stay tuned for updates.

1.4G Holdings, LLC v. North Central Industries, Inc. et al.

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-00037-TWP-MG
File Date: January 5, 2023
Plaintiff: 1.4G Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Philip R. Zimmerly of Bose McKinney & Evans LLP
Defendants: North Central Industries, Inc., Great Grizzly, Inc., R.Brown, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Trade Dress Infringement, Misappropriation
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Mario Garcia

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

December 2022 Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Update

15 Thursday Dec 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

There were no new trademark or copyright lawsuits filed in Indiana in the last month. However, there were some interesting developments in existing cases. A Florida husband/wife marketing team never appeared and received a judgment against them for $159,000. Youtube Celebrity Omi in a Hellcat filed an Amended Counterclaims further asserting his ownership of the RELOADED brand and momentarily rendering moot a Motion to Dismiss. Puma has filed its answer to Brooks’ counterclaims, setting up an epic shoe design battle that could last all of next year. The Court in The Center for Gestalt Development lawsuit is currently deliberating on a fully-briefed Motion to Stay of Proceedings and to Require Plaintiff to Pay Defendant’s Costs of Previously Dismissed Suit. Read on below for details on all pending lawsuits.

Happy holidays to everyone. See you in January for all the latest Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Updates.

Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC v. Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/4/2021) – No update this month.

Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. AMI Stores Management, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/6/2021) – No update this month.

AWGI, LLC et al. v. CLD Trucking Co. d/b/a Atlas Moving Systems AMS (SD, filed 7/22/2021) – No update this month. 

Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc. (ND, filed 8/31/2021) – Deadlines in the Scheduling Order have been continued via motion.

Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 9/24/2021) – An Amended Complaint was filed on November 29, 2022. On December 14, 2022, the parties filed a Joint Status Report hinting at an impending discovery dispute.

View this document on Scribd

Edutainment Live, LLC v. Video Game Palooza et al. (SD, filed 10/11/2021) –  The parties have filed their Witness and Exhibit Lists.

Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. La Jalisco LLP (SD, filed 12/15/2021) –  A Motion for Default Judgment was filed by the Plaintiff on November 21, 2022.

Gabet et al. v. Amazon.com. Inc. et al. (ND, filed 1/20/2022) – The case has been assigned to Mark J. Dinsmore. The new case number is 1:22-cv-02246-JPH-MJD.

Reid v. Stephenson (SD, filed 1/27/2022) – The case has been assigned to Mark J. Dinsmore. The new case number is 1:22-cv-00205-JRS-MJD.

NuStar Enterprises LLC v. Reloaded Merch LLC et al. (ND, filed 4/1/2022) – The Plaintiff filed its Answer to Counterclaims on November 22, 2022. The Defendants then filed an Amended Answer to Complaint on December 7, 2022. The Plaintiff has until December 23, 2022 to reply to the Amended Counterclaims.

View this document on Scribd

Mapes v. Top Tier Marketers LLC d/b/a Artfily et al. (SD, filed 4/4/2022) – On December 8, final judgment was entered and the Plaintiff was awarded $150,000 in statutory damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $7,714.22 and reasonable costs in the amount of $2,007.52.

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. v. Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – No update this month.

PUMA SE et al. v. Brooks Sports, Inc. (SD, filed 7/8/2022) – Puma filed its Answer to Counterclaims on November 23, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thirty-Six Saloon, LLC d/b/a Thirty Six Saloon et al. (SD, filed 7/27/2022) – No update this month. 

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/5/2022) – Trial has been set for March 11, 2024 (Yes, that’s 2024. “The wheels of justice grind slow but grind fine.” – Sun Tzu).

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/11/2022) – A telephonic status conference is scheduled for January 6, 2023.

Honest Abe Roofing franchise, Inc. v. DCH & Associates, LLC et al. (SD, filed 9/7/2022) – The plaintiff filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default on December 6, 2022.

Phoenix USA RV, Inc. v. Hoosier Custom Cruisers LLC et al. (ND, removed 10/7/2022) – The Court entered a Scheduling Order on December 6, 2022.

MaddenCo Inc. v. Reed et al. (SD, filed 10/31/2022) – On December 5, 2022, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.

View this document on Scribd

The Center for Gestalt Development, Inc. v. Bowman (SD (11/09/2022) – On November 29, 2022, the case was reassigned to Judge Richard L. Young and Magistrate Tim A. Baker. The new case number is 1:22-cv-02185-RLY-TAB. The Court has yet to rule on the Defendant’s fully-briefed Motion to Stay of Proceedings and to Require Plaintiff to Pay Defendant’s Costs of Previously Dismissed Suit.

View this document on Scribd

View this document on Scribd

View this document on Scribd

November 2022 Updates – October 2022 Updates – September 2022 Updates – August 2022 Updates – July 2022 Updates

June 2022 Updates – May 2022 Updates – April 2022 Updates – March 2022 Updates

February 2022 Updates– January 2022 Updates – December 2021 Updates

October 2022 Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Update

15 Saturday Oct 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

Indiana Intellectual Property litigators were busy over the last month, with lots of updates in pending litigation. Only one new lawsuit was filed, between an Elkhart RV manufacturer and several of its former employees, but several Answers were filed in other lawsuits, allowing them to finally move forward. See below for the more interesting filings and stay tuned for updates.

Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC v. Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/4/2021) – No update this month.

Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. AMI Stores Management, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/6/2021) – No update this month.

AWGI, LLC et al. v. CLD Trucking Co. d/b/a Atlas Moving Systems AMS (SD, filed 7/22/2021) – No update this month. 

Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc. (ND, filed 8/31/2021) – A Scheduling Conference has been moved to December 1, 2022. No other updates.

Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 9/24/2021) – The defendants filed an Answer on October 11, 2022, more than a year after the Complaint was filed.

View this document on Scribd

Edutainment Live, LLC v. Video Game Palooza et al. (SD, filed 10/11/2021) – No update this month. 

Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. La Jalisco LLP (SD, filed 12/15/2021) – No update this month. 

Gabet et al. v. Amazon.com. Inc. et al. (ND, filed 1/20/2022) – No update this month.

Reid v. Stephenson (SD, filed 1/27/2022) – The Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default on October 4, 2022. There is still no activity from the defendant.

NuStar Enterprises LLC v. Reloaded Merch LLC et al. (ND, filed 4/1/2022) – The defendant filed an Answer on October 4, 2022 which was promptly stricken for failure to comply with local rules. A subsequent Answer was filed on October 12, 2022. A Preliminary Pretrial Conference is scheduled for November 3, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Mapes v. Top Tier Marketers LLC d/b/a Artfily et al. (SD, filed 4/4/2022) – On September 20, 2022, the Platinff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Florida-based husband/wife defendants have still not taken any action in this lawsuit.

View this document on Scribd

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. v. Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – Defendant Bartel filed a Response to Counterclaims on September 26, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

On October 7, 2022, Defendant Havel filed a Motion requesting court-appointed counsel.

View this document on Scribd

The Plaintiff responded to the Motion on October 11, 2022, challenging the Defendant’s claim of lack of competency to defend themselves.

View this document on Scribd

Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc. v. Coulisse Distribution LLC et al. (ND, filed 6/29/2022) – The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on September 28, 2022.

PUMA SE et al. v. Brooks Sports, Inc. (SD, filed 7/8/2022) – The Defendant filed an Answer on September 28, 2022. They also filed a Motion to Change Venue on the same day, which has not yet been fully briefed. The Plaintiff has until October 26, 2022 to respond to the Motion to Change Venue. A Virtual Settlement Conference is scheduled for November 9, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thirty-Six Saloon, LLC d/b/a Thirty Six Saloon et al. (SD, filed 7/27/2022) – A Clerk’s Entry of Default was entered on September 26, 2022.

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/5/2022) – The Defendants have until October 26, 2022 to file their Answer.

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/11/2022) – The Defendants filed an Answer on October 4, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Honest Ave Roofing franchise, Inc. v. DCH & Associates, LLC et al. (SD, filed 9/7/2022) – Certificates of Service were filed on September 13, 2022. Stay tuned for updates.

Phoenix USA RV, Inc. v. Hoosier Custom Cruisers LLC et al. (ND, removed 10/7/2022) – On October 13, 2022, the Defendants requested an Extension of Time to File an Answer.

September 2022 Updates – August 2022 Updates – July 2022 Updates

June 2022 Updates – May 2022 Updates – April 2022 Updates – March 2022 Updates

February 2022 Updates– January 2022 Updates – December 2021 Updates

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...