• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Southern District of Indiana

September 2022 Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Update

15 Thursday Sep 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

Henry Wadsforth Longfellow was invoked by the Court in an Opinion and Order for the Amazon/Ligonier perfumery lawsuit. The Court followed an evocative Longfellow passage about “Ships that pass in the night” with its own damning assessment of the state of the lawsuit:

“There are cases in which all that is shared in the parties’ briefs is the caption. The most mundane facts are passionately disputed. Unfavorable facts are misrepresentations. Unfavorable case law is not just distinguishable, it is irrelevant and misleading. Differing interpretations of evidence are absurd. Every action of opposing counsel is performed with malice.

These cases tax the Court needlessly. Rather than address the salient legal issues, the Court must check and re-check threshold factual matters and blackletter law. Motions cannot be decided before evidentiary objections, and objections to those objections, are resolved. The Court functions less as an adjudicative body and more as a schoolmarm.

This, unfortunately, looks to be one of those cases.”

See the full Opinion and Order below for the rest of the Court’s analysis.

The Omi in a Hellcat lawsuit may also require a schoolmarm soon to intervene in the parties’ dispute over jurisdictional discovery, which has seen charges of obfuscation and improper objections.

Which lawsuits are you following most closely?

Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC v. Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/4/2021) – The Defendants filed a Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment on August 25, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. AMI Stores Management, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/6/2021) – Discovery deadlines have been extended by motion to October 4, 2022.

AWGI, LLC et al. v. CLD Trucking Co. d/b/a Atlas Moving Systems AMS (SD, filed 7/22/2021) – No update this month.

RE/MAX, LLC et al. v. Dulin et al. (SD, filed 8/24/2021) – The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on September 1, 2022.

Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc. (ND, filed 8/31/2021) – The parties’ discovery deadlines were extended by motion on September 2, 2022.

Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 9/24/2021) – No update this month.

Edutainment Live, LLC v. Video Game Palooza et al. (SD, filed 10/11/2021) – No update this month. 

Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. La Jalisco LLP (SD, filed 12/15/2021) – No update this month. 

Gabet et al. v. Amazon.com. Inc. et al. (ND, filed 1/20/2022) – Amazon’s Motion to Transfer Venue was granted on September 6, 2022. The case will be transferred from the Northern District of Indiana to the Southern District of Indiana, so we’ll be able to continue to follow it on this blog.

View this document on Scribd

Reid v. Stephenson (SD, filed 1/27/2022) – The Complaint was served on Lance Stephenson on August 30, 2022. No further update.

Microsoft Corporation v. Solution Hat, LLC d/b/a Think Global et al. (SD, filed 2/25/2022) – The court granted permanent injunction against the Defendants and the lawsuit was dismissed.

NuStar Enterprises LLC v. Reloaded Merch LLC et al. (ND, filed 4/1/2022) – The parties are in the midst of a jurisdictional discovery dispute, and are now awaiting the Court’s ruling on a fully-briefed Motion to Compel Jurisdictional Discovery. The latest filing (below) finds the Plaintiff lamenting the Defendants’ “continued obfuscation” and discovery responses “rife with additional improper objections.” Stay tuned for the Court’s rulings.

View this document on Scribd

View this document on Scribd

Mapes v. Top Tier Marketers LLC d/b/a Artfily et al. (SD, filed 4/4/2022) – Some internal court administration took place over the last month, but no substantive updates.

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. v. Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – On August 17, the Plaintiff filed its Answer to the counterclaims of Defendants Havel and Weaver.

View this document on Scribd

Defendant Bartel filed an Answer on September 9, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc. v. Coulisse Distribution LLC et al. (ND, filed 6/29/2022) – No update yet.

PUMA SE et al. v. Brooks Sports, Inc. (SD, filed 7/8/2022) – Even more attorneys have made pro hac vice appearances this month, but there are no substantive updates.

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thirty-Six Saloon, LLC d/b/a Thirty Six Saloon et al. (SD, filed 7/27/2022) – BMI filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default on September 6, 2022.

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/5/2022) – On August 25, 2022, Defendant Kilroy’s North America, LLC was dismissed from the lawsuit. Amanda C. Couture has appeared as counsel for the remaining defendants, Kilroy’s on Kirkwood and Kilroy’s Sports.

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/11/2022) – Oakley filed Affidavits of Service on September 12, 2022, so we can anticipate the Defendant’s Answer in the next month.

Honest Ave Roofing franchise, Inc. v. DCH & Associates, LLC et al. (SD, filed 9/7/2022) – Certificates of Service were filed on September 13, 2022. Stay tuned for updates.

August 2022 Updates – July 2022 Updates

June 2022 Updates – May 2022 Updates – April 2022 Updates – March 2022 Updates

February 2022 Updates– January 2022 Updates – December 2021 Updates

Honest Abe Roofing sues Georgia Couple for Breach of Franchise Agreement, Trademark Infringement

09 Friday Sep 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Business Law, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Breach of Franchise Agreement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, James R. Sweeney II, Mario Garcia, Misappropriation of Goodwill

In April 2021, the Georgia-based defendants in this Indiana lawsuit entered into a Franchise Agreement with Honest Abe, a roof installation corporation located in Terre Haute, Indiana. The franchise relationship did not last long, and Honest Abe send a first Notice of Default in March 2022 asserting several material defaults. Following the failure by defendants to timely cure the defaults, a Notice of Termination was sent to the defendants on May 5, 2022. The defendants allegedly owe the plaintiff around $186,000 in past-due fees. The defendants are also accused of violating their non-compete agreements by starting a competing roofing company in the same geographic area. The Complaint (below) details interactions between an investigator and the defendants in which the defendants continue to refer to themselves as “Honest Abe.”

Honest Abe also requests a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (see Motion below).

Based on the very thorough complaint (with 19 exhibits) and the motion for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction, I expect the defendants will have a big fight on their hands. Pursuant to the Franchise Agreements, the defendants could also be responsible for Honest Abe’s attorney fees and costs, which are probably already substantial.

Stay tuned for updates.

Honest Abe Roofing Franchise, Inc. v. DCH & Associates, LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 2:22-cv-00387-JRS-MG
File Date: September 7, 2022
Plaintiff: Honest Abe Roofing Franchise, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: William W. Drummy of Wilkinson Goeller Modesitt Wilkinson & Drummy LLP
Defendants: DCH & Associates, LLC, Honest Abe Roofing of Macon Georgia, LLC, Dameion Harris, Christine Harris
Cause: Federal Trademark Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Breach of Franchise Agreement, Breach of Contract, Common Law Unfair Competition, Misappropriation of Goodwill
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: James R. Sweeney II
Referred To: Mario Garcia

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction:

View this document on Scribd

Mid-August 2022 Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Update

15 Monday Aug 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

Summer is winding down and schools are starting to get back in session. The federal courts in Indiana have had a busy close to the summer as they continue to move existing copyright and trademark lawsuits toward resolution. A few interesting new cases were filed in the last month, including claims of counterfeiting, non-payment of wages, and copyright infringement.

What lawsuits are you following most closely?

Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC v. Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/4/2021) – The Plaintiff filed its Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment on August 12, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Noble Roman’s, Inc. v. AMI Stores Management, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 6/6/2021) – Noble Roman’s filed a motion to extend deadlines on August 12, 2022.

AWGI, LLC et al. v. CLD Trucking Co. d/b/a Atlas Moving Systems AMS (SD, filed 7/22/2021) – No update this month.  

RE/MAX, LLC et al. v. Dulin et al. (SD, filed 8/24/2021) – The parties filed a Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference and Notice of Settlement on August 1, 2022. The parties have been granted until August 30, 2022 to file a Stipulation of Dismissal.

Forest River, Inc. v. inTech Trailers, Inc. (ND, filed 8/31/2021) – On July 28, 2022, the Defendant filed an Opposition Proceeding with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board against the DELLA TERRA trademark application.

Thomas v. ooShirts, Inc. et al. (SD, filed 9/24/2021) – A Protective Order was entered on August 11, 2022, presumably to protect the terms of settlement. The parties are awaiting the Court’s order on a fully-plead (as of August 8) Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement.

Edutainment Live, LLC v. Video Game Palooza et al. (SD, filed 10/11/2021) – No update this month.

Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. La Jalisco LLP (SD, filed 12/15/2021) – No update this month.

Gabet et al. v. Amazon.com. Inc. et al. (ND, filed 1/20/2022) – On July 19, 2022, the Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Strike Reply to Response to Motion in support of the Motion to Transfer Venue. Amazon filed its Response on July 29, 2022 and the Plaintiffs’ Reply (below) was filed on August 12, 2022. A telephonic conference is scheduled for August 18, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Reid v. Stephenson (SD, filed 1/27/2022) – No update this month.

Microsoft Corporation v. Solution Hat, LLC d/b/a Think Global et al. (SD, filed 2/25/2022) – The Court has ordered that dismissal documents be filed by September 16, 2022.

The American Automobile Association, Inc. v. All American Auto Hail Dent Repair LLC d/b/a AAA Hail Repair et al. (SD, filed 3/23/2022) – The lawsuit was dismissed on August 9, 2022 following entry of a Consent Judgment.

NuStar Enterprises LLC v. Reloaded Merch LLC et al. (ND, filed 4/1/2022) – On August 12, 2022, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel Jurisdictional Discovery. The parties are still working to resolve the jurisdiction issue.

Mapes v. Top Tier Marketers LLC d/b/a Artfily et al. (SD, filed 4/4/2022) – On August 8, 2022, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default.

The Evolutionary Level Above Human, Inc. v. Havel et al (ND, filed 5/18/2022) – The Defendants filed an 82-page Answer (plus 158 pages of Exhibits) on July 26, 2022.

View this document on Scribd

Lafayette Venetian Blind, Inc. v. Coulisse Distribution LLC et al. (ND, filed 6/29/2022) – No update yet.

PUMA SE et al. v. Brooks Sports, Inc. (SD, filed 7/8/2022) – Many attorneys have filed appearances, but no other updates yet.

Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Thirty-Six Saloon, LLC d/b/a Thirty Six Saloon et al. (SD, filed 7/27/2022) – No update yet.

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/5/2022) – No update yet.

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al (SD, filed 8/11/2022) – No update yet.

July 2022 Updates

June 2022 Updates – May 2022 Updates – April 2022 Updates – March 2022 Updates

February 2022 Updates– January 2022 Updates – December 2021 Updates

Oakley sues Indianapolis Indoor Baseball Training Facility over Sale of Counterfeit Sunglasses

12 Friday Aug 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Indianapolis, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Federal Trademark Infringement, Mark J. Dinsmore, Richard L. Young

The defendants in this counterfeiting lawsuit operate an indoor baseball and softball training facility in Indianapolis. The plaintiff, Oakley, has accused the defendants of selling counterfeit sunglasses. The plaintiff’s investigators purchased counterfeit sunglasses from the defendants at the Edinburgh Sports Complex (i.e. a place where baseball is played) and at the defendant’s retail location in Indianapolis.

Oakley seeks an injunction, statutory damages, attorney fees’ and costs. Oakley is probably equally interested in obtaining information about the source of the counterfeit goods, possibly somewhere overseas.

Stay tuned for updates.

Oakley, Inc. v. Batter’s Box Training, LLC et al

Court Case Number: 1:22-cv-01596-RLY-MJD
File Date: August 11, 2022
Plaintiff: Oakley, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Zachary D. Prendergast of Robbins, Kelly, Patterson & Tucker, LPA
Defendants: Batter’s Box Training, LLC, Shawn Lessor, Brandi Pierson
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Richard L. Young
Referred To: Mark J. Dinsmore

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

AV Intern sues Kilroy’s Sports for Non-Payment of Wages, Copyright Infringement

09 Tuesday Aug 2022

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Copyright Infringement, Debra McVicker Lynch, Declaratory Judgment of Copyright Ownership, Fraud, Promissory Estoppel, Sarah Evans Barker, Unjust Enrichment, Violation of the Wage Payment Act

A popular college bar in Bloomington, Indiana is accused of non-payment of $12,000 to an intern who had been creating content for their social media accounts. The Complaint (below) details several months of promised, delayed, and ultimately unrealized paychecks.

The Complaint includes claims for declaratory judgment of copyright ownership and copyright infringement, but I assume that the intern is less interested in ownership of the bar’s social media content and more interested in getting paid for months of labor. The specific works alleged to have been infringed are not identified in the Complaint and there is no mention of registration of any works, a prerequisite for a copyright infringement claim, so the copyright claims could be vulnerable to challenge. As jurisdiction for the lawsuit is based on the copyright and declaratory judgment of copyright ownership claims, we might see an early battle over jurisdiction.

Ideally, the intern will just get paid what he is owed before lawyers for both sides get deep into researching and drafting motions. Stay tuned for updates.

Schwartz v. Kilroy’s North America, LLC et al

Case Number: 1:22-cv-01563-SEB-DML
File Date: August 5, 2022
Plaintiff: Elijah Schwartz
Plaintiff Counsel: Kimberly D. Jeselskis, B.J. Brinkerhoff, Hannah Kaufman Joseph of Jeselskis Kaufman and Joseph, LLC
Defendant: Kilroy’s North America, LLC, Kilroy’s Sports, LLC, Kilroy’s on Kirkwood, LLC
Cause: Violation of the Wage Payment Act, Breach of Contract, Promissory Estoppel, Unjust Enrichment, Fraud, Declaratory Judgment of Copyright Ownership, Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referred To: Debra McVicker Lynch

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...