• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Litigation

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update

13 Wednesday May 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Litigation

≈ Leave a comment

NEW Copyright Ligitation Alert:

Court Case Number: 4:09-cv-00035-AS-PRC
File Date: Tuesday, May 05, 2009
Plaintiff: UMG Recordings Inc, Atlantic Recording Corporation, Sony Music Entertainment
Plaintiff Counsel: James Dimos, Joel E. Tragesser of Frost Brown Todd LLC
Defendant: Alexander Schmidt
Cause: 17:501 Copyright Infringement
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Judge: Judge Allen Sharp
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry

Indiana Patent Litigation Update

12 Tuesday May 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Patent

≈ Leave a comment

NEW Patent Ligitation Alert:

Plaintiff: Echo Engineering & Production Supplies, Inc.
Defendant: Engineered Products & Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00582
Filed: May 8, 2009
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Presiding Judge: Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property – Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Stay tuned for updates.

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Heckler & Koch v. Tippman Sports, Tigerstripe Paintball

07 Thursday May 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ 11 Comments

Tags

Tim A. Baker, William T. Lawrence

Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00560-WTL-TAB
File Date: Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Plaintiff: Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian J. McGinnis, Darlene R. Seymour of Continental Enterprises
Defendant: Tippman Sports LLC, Tigerstripe Paintball LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

heckler1Leave a comment with your email if you’d like a copy of the full Complaint.

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update

24 Friday Apr 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Exhibit Chicago, Inc. (U.S. District Court, N.D. Indiana)
No: 1:08-CV-124-TS.
Before: Springmann

For full opinion:
2009 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 32058
2009 WL 1010843

TRADEMARK; DAMAGES (Treble damages and attorney’s fees are appropriate where defendant willfully infringed trademarks for more than a year.)

Opinion (Springmann): Plaintiff Days Inn Worldwide (“Days Inn”) licensed its trademarks to Defendant Exhibit Chicago (“Exhibit”).  Days Inn later revoked the license.  After revocation, Exhibit continued to use Days Inn’s marks, only replacing the name Days with Huntington on the main sign.  Days Inn sued Exhibit for trademark infringement, and Exhibit defaulted. Because Days Inn alleged that Exhibit willfully infringed and continues to infringe its registered incontestable marks, treble damages and attorney’s fees are appropriate.

Source: Willamette Law Online

days_inn

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update

24 Friday Apr 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Litigation

≈ Leave a comment

Brooks-Ngwenya v. Indianapolis Public Schools (U.S. Court Of Appeals, Seventh Circuit)
No: 08-1973 (April 15, 2009)
Before: Posner, Williams, and Tinder

COPYRIGHT; RIGHT TO SUE (Registration denial does not preclude an applicant from initiating a copyright suit.)

Opinion (Per Curiam): Brooks-Ngwenya, a middle school teacher sued the Indianapolis Public Schools (“IPS”) for copyright infringement related to an educational program that she had developed.  The District Court granted summary judgment to IPS, on the ground that Brooks-Ngwenya’s copyright registration was denied prior to the filing of the suit.  The Seventh Circuit disagreed with this reasoning by relying on section 411(a) of the Copyright Act, which allows an applicant to file a copyright suit, even if the registration was denied.  Brooks-Ngwenya claimed that IPS copied the ideas of her program, without proving that IPS copied the documents related to her educational program.  Therefore, on substantive grounds, the Seventh Circuit found that Brooks-Ngwenya’s copyright claim failed due to the lack of evidence that IPS copied the original expression of Brooks-Ngwenya’s idea, since the idea itself is not copyrightable.  Affirmed.

Click here for full opinion.

Source: Willamette Law Online

ips2

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (329)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (605)
  • Indianapolis (52)
  • Intellectual Property (666)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (598)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (216)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (370)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (367)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    Join 81 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...