• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Intellectual Property

Counterfeit Bongs dominate the February Indiana IP Litigation Docket

01 Friday Mar 2019

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Copyright Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Integrity of Copyright Management Information, Photography, Richard Bell, Trade Dress Infringement, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Two photography cases, including one from serial filer Richard Bell, and a breach of franchise agreement lawsuit…other than that, the February Indiana IP litigation docket was totally dominated by filings by RooR International. RooR’s defendants are Indiana smokeshops and their alleged sale of counterfeit bongs.

RooR markets itself as “the premier manufacturer of glass water pipes by emphasizing the brand’s unwavering use of quality materials and focusing on scientific principles which facilitate a superior smoking experience.”

As you can see from the screenshot below, RooR International has gone on a recent filing spree to combat the sale of counterfeit products:

Screen Shot 2019-03-01 at 9.18.39 AM.png

RooR’s defendants, small smoke and vape shops from across Indiana, are accused of Federal Trademark Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin and Federal Unfair Competition. Heavy stuff.

Sample RooR Complaint

View this document on Scribd

The other non-bong, non-Bell cases involve the breach of a franchise agreement and the unauthorized use of a photograph of a New Year’s Eve fireworks display.

Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, BR IP Holder LLC v. Big Scoops, Inc., David M. Glasgow Jr.

View this document on Scribd

Bachner v. USA Halloween Planet Inc.

View this document on Scribd

Protect your Baby by Preparing a Will

28 Thursday Feb 2019

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Estate Law, Intellectual Property

≈ Leave a comment

It seems like there are babies and young children everywhere I look nowadays.  I’ve found myself giving the following advice repeatedly, so I thought I’d post it here for everyone’s benefit:

Protect Your Baby.  Prepare a Will.

Having a new baby will likely be one of your most wonderful and rewarding experiences. But planning for a baby means planning for both the good and the bad. Unfortunately, the “bad” may include your death or permanent disability while your child is still young.

If you want ensure that your children will be raised and provided for in the way you intend, you need to seriously consider creating a will that states who should take care of your children and their finances.

Undoubtedly, it’s best practice to prepare a will after the birth of your first child, and update the will before the arrival of any more children. Without a will, the state will decide who will care for your children and how your money will be divided, and there are no guarantees that the state will follow your wishes.

Before preparing a will, there are a few questions you must answer:

Who will be your child’s guardian?
Perhaps the most important question for parents when drafting legal wills is the question of who will be the child’s guardian. Think carefully about who you would like to raise your child in the event of an untimely death. Make sure you discuss this guardianship with the party in question before you draft the will. Discuss the things that may be really important to you for your children such as education, religion and family connection. Don’t wait too long before writing a will if you already have a child, as establishing guardianship is one of the most important things a parent can do.

What property is included in your will?
When you draft a will, you must think about what property will be included. You can be as specific or as general as you’d like when naming property. You can simply refer to your property as a body by referencing your estate, or you can break down specific or individual pieces of property that have special value, like artwork or collectibles. In the event that property isn’t designated in the will or a general term that encompasses the entire estate, it reverts to the state’s probate laws for distribution. You can handle disbursement of property a few different ways. If you’ve listed specific items of property, you can designate individuals to receive that property. Alternatively, you can simply designate who gets what portion of your estate, and let the named parties decide how to divide the property based on your allocations.

Who will be executor of your will?
After guardianship of your child, naming an executor is one of the most important decisions you can make. The executor is responsible for settling your estate after your death, and ensuring that your will is honored. An executor has to handle all the paperwork, liquidate assets, pay any taxes and distribute the proceeds according to the instructions in your will. Make sure you choose a trustworthy executor. If you don’t want to leave this burden to a friend or family member, choose a professional executor or a lawyer to handle the process.

Nobody wants to think about dying while their children are little, so unfortunately many people don’t. But now is the time to make plans and set them down in writing. Once you have the above questions answered, find a lawyer who can prepare your will. Wills are revocable, meaning you can always change them later, as necessary. However, setting something in motion now will be best for your children and give you peace of mind that it has been taken care of. Create a will now…and then relax and enjoy watching your children grow and prosper.

Free Legal Resources in Indianapolis

27 Wednesday Feb 2019

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indianapolis, Intellectual Property, Litigation

≈ Leave a comment

Due to budgetary restrictions, the Marion County Law Library in Indianapolis ceased to operate in 2010 and hasn’t reopened.

If you’d like to do some free legal research or access court forms on your own,  there are still a few options. Computers with Internet access to court forms are available at public libraries around town and at the Central Library located at 40. E. St. Clair St., phone 317-275-4100.

You can do legal research at the Ruth Lilly Law Library in I.U. Robert H. McKinney School of Law (hours and access policies).

Please note that individual courts do not have forms and their staff cannot advise you on the use of appropriate forms or assist with filling them out.

For a free legal consultation (service availability is often based on income level), you may contact the following organizations:

  • Indiana Legal Aid Society: 317-635-9539
  • Legal Services: 317-631-9410
  • Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic: 317-415-5337
  • Indianapolis Bar Association’s Lawyer Referral Service: 317-269-2222
  • Free Legal Line, every second Tuesday of the month, between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m: 317-269-2000
  • Legal Advice Hot Line, 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday-Friday: 317-269-2222 ($35.00 for a 20-minute phone consultation with attorney)

501(c)(3) v. 501(c)(6) Nonprofits

26 Tuesday Feb 2019

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Legislation, Nonprofit

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Tax

Many people are familiar with the “501(c)(3)” nonprofit designation. But what many don’t realize is that Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code is just one of many tax law provisions granting exemption from the federal income tax to nonprofit organizations. Another common designation is the 501(c)(6) nonprofit. For each type of exemption classification, varying rules and requirements may apply. The following information will help nonprofits and donors understand the distinction between these two types of nonprofit organizations, 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(6), including important tax deduction consequences.

501(c)(3)

501(c)(3) exemptions apply to entities organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (e.g. NCAA).

Donors who make charitable contributions to most types of 501(c)(3) organizations generally are afforded a charitable deduction under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code. Regulations specify the applicable requirements for donors to claim such deductions (e.g., receipts for donations over $250).

501(c)(6)

A 501(c)(6) is specifically reserved to business leagues. A business league is an association of persons having some common business interest, the purpose of which is to promote such common interest and not to engage in a regular business of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit. Trade associations and professional associations are business leagues. To be exempt, a business league’s activities must be devoted to improving business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from performing particular services for individual persons. 501(c)(6) organizations are exempt from most federal income taxes. However, donations to a 501(c)(6) are not tax deductible as charitable contributions, as is the case with a 501(c)(3). Donations to 501(c)(6) organizations are not required to be disclosed.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of key characteristics of 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(6) nonprofit designations:

Note: this blog post contains general advice. Please consult your own attorney or accountant with specific legal and tax issues.

 

Should You Register Your Trademark?

04 Monday Feb 2019

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Application Filing Fee, Clearance Search, Patent, Thompson CompuMark, Trademark, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO

Clients often inquire whether it’s in their best interest to register their trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).

The traditional short answer is: ”Yes, if at all possible, you should register your trademarks!” This advice has been widely echoed by qualified intellectual property attorneys.

The purpose of this post is to give you additional financial information with which you can decide whether to register your trademarks. Some lawyers will tell you it’s “expensive.” The same lawyers might tell other clients that it’s “not expensive.” I’ll provide some real numbers that you can actually put into your budget.

First, keep in mind that registration of  trademarks is not required. Common law rights arise naturally from actual use of a trademark. Generally, the first entity to either use a trademark in commerce or file an intent to use application with the USPTO has the ultimate right to use and registration. However, filing for and receiving a federal trademark registration on the Principal Register provides several advantages:

  • constructive notice to the public of the registrant’s claim of ownership of the mark;
  • a legal presumption of the registrant’s ownership of the mark and the registrant’s exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the registration;
  • the ability to bring an action concerning the mark in federal court;
  • the use of the U.S registration as a basis to obtain registration in foreign countries; and
  • the ability to file the U.S. registration with the U.S. Customs Service to prevent importation of infringing foreign goods.

Optimally, all trademark owners who consider their trademark a valuable business asset (…and, if not, why continue using the mark?) would like to obtain these advantages.  But registration is not free.  Here are some of the likely fees (based on the USPTO’s current Fee Schedule, last revised January 1, 2019) that you will face before and during the registration procedure:

Clearance Search – Before adopting and using a trademark, it’s advised that a trademark clearance search be performed to determine the availability of the trademark.  This will help determine whether there is another user already using the trademark, i.e. having superior rights in the trademark.  By performing an initial trademark clearance search, a business can avoid incurring liability for trademark infringement and avoid investing resources in a trademark which could be unusable because it infringes another’s trademark rights. Most attorneys will conduct a clearance search at their standard hourly rate. Expect the clearance search to cost $200-400.

A commercial research service like Thomson CompuMark, which conducts a search across numerous databases (federal, state, common law, business databases) will cost around $700.  Add attorney time to review and report on the results.

Application Filing Fee – The official filing fee ranges between $225-$400 (based on the goods/services selected, paper submissions cost more than applications filed online). Your attorney will charge a fee for the application preparation and filing, likely ranging between $400-$1000.

Response to Office Action – Office actions are letters from the USPTO that set forth the legal status of a trademark application. Typically, the examining attorney will set forth various requirements that the applicant must meet before an application can be approved for publication.  A majority of your attorney’s time in the application process will be spent reviewing and responding to the office action.

Looking into the future, you’ll want to keep in mind the renewal costs which will be paid after five (5) years. Expect to pay $500 for each class of goods and services that your trademark protects. (For example, if a band has registered its band name for both “musical services” and “t-shirts,”  it will be paying filing fees for two separate classes of protection. This applies to filing fees also.)

Notwithstanding the renewal costs, and assuming that no extensions, etc. are required, you’re looking at approximately $800-$1000 to file a federal application for one trademark protecting one class of goods/services. On top of the USPTO fees, you’ll be paying your trademark attorney for their time spent gathering information, preparing documents, filing the application and communicating with the USPTO.  Therefore, choosing a trademark attorney who provides excellent service at a lower cost can greatly enhance your bottom line. Also, these are just some of the more common fees you will face in registering your trademark…there may be additional filings/costs associated with your trademark registration, depending on the specifics of your trademark and the strategy of your attorney.

So, should you register your trademark??? The traditional answer still rings true…if fiscally possible, do it. Trademarks are valuable business assets that are typically far greater in value than any costs associated with registration. Always bear in mind that economies rise and fall, but trademark rights can continue indefinitely. Unfortunately, that means that spending less today to protect your trademark rights may allow another party to intervene and lock up important trademark rights for the future.  Also, be sure to consider how licensing opportunities might be affected should you not register your trademarks.

Final practical note:  Any time you claim rights in a mark, you may use the “TM” (trademark) or “SM” (service mark) designation to alert the public to your claim, regardless of whether you have filed an application with the USPTO.  It’s free and reinforces good habits among those wearing the “marketing” hat.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (328)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (605)
  • Indianapolis (52)
  • Intellectual Property (665)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (597)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (216)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (370)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (365)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...