• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Indianapolis Museum of Art Launches Content on iTunes U

24 Saturday Jul 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Artists, Indianapolis, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

IMA

I just stumbled upon this cool press release. If you haven’t checked out iTunes U, it has some great (and free) educational content. Take a look.

The Indianapolis Museum of Art recently announced that it has launched its own presence on iTunes U. iTunes U delivers easy access to educational content from hundreds of colleges, universities and educationally focused organizations across the country. The site was launched on January 28 and currently features 20 videos and three audio tours, which were produced by the IMA’s new media team.

Working closely with staff at Apple, the IMA’s new media team created a selection of content for the launch of its iTunes U site that represents the diversity of projects the IMA has to offer as an encyclopedic museum. The IMA’s digital content includes video featuring visiting artists such as Maria Magdalena Campos-Pons, El Anatsui and Hirokazu Kosaka; videos about works in the IMA’s collection; and audio guides featuring artist Adrian Schiess, the art-collective spurse and the IMA’s gardens and grounds. The content can be found in the Beyond Campus section of iTunes U. Beyond Campus includes audio and video content from the IMA as well as the Museum of Modern Art, Smithsonian Global Sound and other cultural institutions.

Indiana, IBM fight over $9M in equipment

23 Friday Jul 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Greg Zoeller, Mitch Daniels

IBM has sent a letter to Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller, demanding the return of more than $9 million in computers, printers, telephones and other equipment.

IBM and the state have sued each other over the the cancellation of a contract for the modernization of the state’s welfare delivery system.

Gov. Mitch Daniels canceled the state’s $1.37 billion contract last year following months of problems and complaints about the automated intake system.

IBM is not disputing the state’s right to cancel the contract, but is arguing in court that the state should pay for the equipment.

See Indy.com for the full story.

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Brian Andr’e Warren v. Xlibris Corporation

23 Friday Jul 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Tim A. Baker, William T. Lawrence

Brian Andr’e Warren v. Xlibris Corporation

A prisoner sought to proceed pro se in a copyright action but couldn’t pay his filing fees. The prisoner attempted to proceed in forma pauperis, but was denied by the Court.  Apparently, the plaintiff had brought over three bad lawsuits in the past and thus lost his entitlement to proceed in forma pauperis. This action was filed on July 6 and closed on July 16 without prejudice.

“In forma pauperis” refers to a motion filed by a low-income person in order to proceed in court without having to pay court costs, usually filing fees. It doesn’t usually cover other costs, such as those involved in discovery (depositions, witness fees, court reporters, etc.) and service of process.

Here’s the language of the Court’s Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis:

The plaintiff’s complaint in this action is accompanied by his request to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff has acquired three or more “strikes” through having litigation to which he was a party in a federal court dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted or as frivolous. Therefore, he is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis, unless the exception under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), that he “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury,” applies. Those circumstances are not presented by this complaint based on copyright infringement.

The circumstances of this case trigger the rule of Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999), which states:

An effort to bamboozle the court by seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis after a federal judge has held that §1915(g) applies to a particular litigant will lead to immediate termination of the suit.

Accordingly, the plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice.

For a full copy of the Complaint or Order, please leave a comment.

Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00885-WTL -TAB
File Date: Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Plaintiff: Brian Andr’e Warren
Plaintiff Counsel: Brian Andr’e Warren – Pro Se
Defendant: Xlibris Corporation
Cause: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Brandt Industries v. Pitonyak Machinery Corporation

14 Wednesday Jul 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Debra McVicker Lynch, Estoppel by Laches, False Designation of Origin, Tanya Walton Pratt, Unfair Competition

Brandt Industries v. Pitonyak Machinery Corporation

This is a declaratory judgment action by Plaintiff for the unregistered BRANDT mark. Both parties have used the mark for many decades in different locations. Plaintiff is a Canadian company operating in the U.S. Leave a comment for a full copy of the complaint.

Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00857-TWP -DML
File Date: Tuesday, July 06, 2010
Plaintiff: Brandt Industries Ltd.
Plaintiff Counsel: Carrie A. Shufflebarger of Thompson Hine LLP
Defendant Counsel: Aaron M. Staser, Paul B. Hunt
Defendant: Pitonyak Machinery Corporation
Cause: Declaration of Non-Infringement, Declaration of Priority, Declaration of Estoppel by Laches, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Innovation Showcase Set for 2-7 PM at the Purdue Technology Center

13 Tuesday Jul 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property

≈ Leave a comment

Indianapolis, Indiana — Entrepreneurs representing 40 new and expanding Indiana businesses presented technologies and economic opportunities before investors and business leaders at the inaugural Indiana Innovation Showcase.

Event will be held from 2-7 p.m. in the Purdue Technology Center located in the Purdue Research Park at AmeriPlex-Indianapolis near the Indianapolis International Airport.

Participating in the invitation-only program are more than 250 entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, angel investors and economic development leaders. Program is sponsored by the Indiana Venture Club, Purdue Research Foundation and the Indiana Economic Development Corp. (IEDC).

Speakers for the program include Gary Anderson, senior advisor for TL Ventures and keynote speaker for the program; Joseph B. Hornett, senior vice president, treasurer and COO, Purdue Research Foundation; Steve Hourigan, director for the 21st Century Fund and entrepreneurship, IEDC; Faraz Abassi, president, Venture Club of Indiana; John Hanak, statewide director, Purdue Technology Centers, Purdue Research Foundation; and Bruce Kidd, senior vice president, Walker Information Inc.

Entrepreneurs who participated in the showcase have already raised more than $100 million in funding for their firms. Participating companies included: Kylin Therapeutics Inc., West Lafayette; CMT: Comfort Motion Technologies, Anderson; First Precision LLC, Merrillville; Ikotech LLC, New Albany; Indiana Nanotech LLC, Indianapolis; Wolf Technical Services Inc., Indianapolis; OrthoPediatrics Corp., Warsaw; and Vontoo Inc., Indianapolis. A full list of participating companies can be found here.

Source: Source: Inside INdiana Business

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...