Tag Archives: Federal False Designation of Origin

Trade Dress Lawsuit filed in Indiana over Trailer Axle Hubcaps

04 Monday Mar 2024

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

An Elkhart, Indiana-based hubcap manufacturer has been sued for trademark and trade dress infringement. The plaintiff, Valcrum of Cypress, Texas, manufactures hubcaps for medium-duty (8,000-16,000 pounds) trailer axles. Valcrum’s axles use a distinctive design consisting of a “signature red hex bezel having a hexagonal outer perimeter and an inner diameter.”

The defendant, Dexter Axle Company, has an extensive business history with Valcrum. The ultimate result of the breakdown of their business relationship, as detailed in the Complaint below, was Dexter producing its own line of axle hubcaps, which allegedly violate the plaintiff’s trademark and trade dress rights. The Complaint also alleges numerous violations of a nondisclosure agreement executed by the parties in 2020.

Stay tuned for updates.

Valcrum, LLC v. Dexter Axle Company, LLC

Court Case Number: 3:24-cv-00190-DRL-MGG
File Date: March 1, 2024
Plaintiff: Valcrum, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Andrew J. Chabot of Botkin & Hall, LLP
Defendant: Dexter Axle Company, LLC
Cause: Breach of Contract, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Trade Dress Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trade Dress Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unjust Enrichment
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Damon R. Leichty
Referred To: Michael G. Gotsch, Sr.

Complaint:

Fort Wayne Company sued for sale of Unauthorized Animal Health Supplements on Amazon

09 Friday Feb 2024

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Nutramax Laboratories (“Nutramax”), the plaintiff in Indiana’s latest trademark lawsuit, produces health supplements for companion animals. Nutramax distributes its products through multiple trade channels, including through resellers that only have an online sales outlet. Nutramax’s resellers are required to sign an Authorized Reseller Agreement which includes requirements around product quality and customer service.

The defendants, a Fort Wayne company, are allegedly unauthorized resellers that are selling Nutramax products on the Amazon Marketplace. The defendants have not signed the Authorized Reseller Agreement.

Nutramax’s counsel sent cease-and-desist communications in October 2023 and January 2024, but apparently have not received a response and the unauthorized Amazon sales have continued. As such, Nutramax now seeks the assistance of the Northern District of Indiana to enforce its trademark rights.

Stay tuned for updates.

Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. CNB Retailers, LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 3:24-cv-00129-DRL-MGG
File Date: February 8, 2024
Plaintiff: Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., Nutramax Laboratories Veterinary Sciences Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Mark D. Boveri of Krieg Default LLP
Defendant: CNB Retailers, LLC d/b/a Amazon Seller Account “UniversalExports”; Brett Hart; Christina Miller
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal False Description, Indiana Common Law Tortious Interference with a Contract
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Damon R. Leichty
Referred To: Michael G. Gotsch, Sr.

Complaint:

Trademark Infringement Lawsuit filed in Indiana over Surgical Bovine Collagen, Implant Kits

02 Thursday Nov 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

The plaintiff in this new Indiana trademark infringement lawsuit, Ventris Medical, offers a bovine collagen product for management of complex wounds called CONNEXT®.

The defendant, Nexxt Spine of Noblesville, Indiana, recently adopted and is using the mark CONNEXX in connection with a surgical implant kit.

Per the Complaint (below), cease-and-desist communications have been unsuccessful to date and the plaintiff now seeks court intervention in the Southern District of Indiana.

In this case, both parties sell products to highly sophisticated consumers, i.e. surgeons. The more sophisticated the purchaser, the less likely that there will be likelihood of confusion. The defendant likely considered that high sophistication level when selecting its similar trademark.

Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC v. Nexxt Spine, LLC

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-01960-JRS-MKK
File Date: November 1, 2023
Plaintiff: Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Samuel B. Gardner of Ice Miller LLP
Defendant: Nexxt Spine, LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Passing Off
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: James R. Sweeney II
Referred To: M. Kendra Klump

Complaint:

Indiana Lawn Care Manufacturer sues eBay Counterfeiter in Northern District of Indiana

09 Monday Oct 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Perma-Green, based in Valparaiso, Indiana, has manufactured and sold commercial lawn care products since 1973. They own an incontestable registration for the trademark PERMAGREEN for “mechanical spreaders and sprayers for the lawn care industry” with a claimed date of first use of February 1, 2005.

“Dr. Permagreen” is an eBay Seller account that lists over 1,400 Perma-Green products, including replacement parts. However, the parts being sold by the eBay account are allegedly low-quality counterfeit copies created in China, not authentic Perma-Green products.

Perma-Green alleges consumer confusion has been caused by the eBay account’s use of a similar name and deceptive product titles, with consumers falsely believing that the eBay account is associated with Perma-Green and that the products originate from Perma-Green. Consumer complaints over defective products were incorrectly directed towards Perma-Green, presumably damaging the goodwill in their brand.

Faulty or defective parts can obviously be a big problem when it comes to lawn care equipment by creating an increased risk of serious injury. After unsuccessful cease-and-desist communications, Perma-Green has brought a lawsuit (see Complaint below) seeking court intervention in an attempt to halt the damage currently being done to its brand. The Complaint alleges willful infringement based on email communications from the alleged operator of the eBay account.

Stay tuned for updates.

Perma-Green Supreme, Inc. v. Dr. Permagreen, LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 2:23-cv-00341
File Date: October 6, 2023
Plaintiff: Perma-Green Supreme, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: P.Stephen Fardy, William D. Patterson of Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP
Defendant: Dr. Permagreen, LLC, Michael Edward Klott, FTW Investments LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal False Advertising, Deceptive Consumer Sales, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Philip P. Simon
Referred To: John E. Martin

Complaint:

AAA sues Anderson’s All American Auto for Trademark Infringement, Cybersquatting

24 Thursday Mar 2022

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

The plaintiff in this trademark lawsuit is the American Automobile Association (AAA), i.e. that card in your wallet that you only pull out when you get a flat tire or lock your keys in the car. I’m actually surprised to read in the Complaint (below) that AAA has only 60 million members. I figured just about every driving American (231 million Americans held valid driving licenses in 2020) had a membership. For the low price of an annual membership, AAA is an absolute bargain when you’re stuck on the side of the highway far from home. Importantly for this lawsuit, AAA claims to also offer auto repair services.

The defendant is an Anderson, Indiana-based company with the patriotic name “All American Auto Hail Repair” using the internet domains AAA-HAILDENT-REPAIR.BUSINESS.SITE and AAAHAILDENTREPAIR.COM to advertise its services. The defendant is a small garage providing automobile dent removal services.

The defendant might challenge whether AAA really offers auto repairs under the AAA brands, or whether automobiles are just towed away by AAA trucks to have repairs performed by third-party repair companies. However, despite the surprisingly low number of members, AAA will still likely be considered a “famous” brand, which could grant it broader protection for ancillary goods/services like auto dent repairs.

It seems like a quick resolution, although perhaps legally unnecessary, would be for the defendant to just select a different domain name(s). AllAmericanAutoDentRepair.com is available right now, just sayin’. Some fights aren’t worth fighting.

Stay tuned for updates.

The American Automobile Association, Inc. v. All American Auto Hail Dent Repair LLC d/b/a AAA Hail Repair et al.

Case Number: 1:22-cv-00568-JPH-MJD
File Date: March 23, 2022
Plaintiff: The American Automobile Association, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: David O. Tittle, Elizabeth S. Traylor of Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP
Defendant: All American Auto Hail Dent Repair LLC d/b/a AAA Hail Repair, Lavern Pflugh
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Federal Trademark Dilution, Indiana Trademark Infringement, Indiana Trademark Dilution, Indiana Unfair Competition
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referred To: Mark J. Dinsmore

Complaint: