What is Innovation? – TechPoint Event 10/2/09

techPoint-LogoBringing breakthrough ideas to market creates new business opportunities, investment and jobs – the latest studies from Federal Reserve economists show that innovation (measured by patents-per-capita) is the strongest predictor of prosperity among states and regions.

At the company level, innovation can come from anywhere – not just R&D, but sales & marketing, IT, operations, finance or administration.  Come hear from leading experts on how to effectively encourage and harness the power of innovation in your organization.

Date: October 2, 2009

Speakers:
Alan Miller, AMD Lasers, LLC
Rich Boling, VP Corporate Advancement, Techshot, Inc.

8:00 a.m. Registration and continental breakfast
8:30 – 9:30 a.m. Presentation

Click here to register.

Hope to see you there!

A Legal Primer for Bloggers – Intellectual Property

A Legal Primer for Bloggers, Part 2 – Intellectual Property

This post continues a series dealing specifically with the legal issues that bloggers should be thinking about.  Part 2 will help you understand your rights to link to information or graphics from other sources, quote from articles and blogs, or otherwise use someone else’s copyrighted works.  It will also discuss the appropriate use of trademarks in blogs (both your marks and those of others).

I. Overview of Intellectual Property

What is copyright?

Copyright gives a creative person control over the use of an original work of authorship.  A copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce a work, prepare derivative works, distribute copies or perform a work publicly.  In the world of bloggers, original works of authorship can include text, images, audio or video creations (and a whole host of other things).

What is trademark?

A trademark is a distinctive sign or indicator used to identify that the products or services with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities.

So think:

Pepsi®, McDonalds®, Apple®

Or:

pepsi logo mcdonalds apple logo

When you either hear/read the word mark or see the logo mark, you immediately associate that trademark with a particular product or service.  Obviously, these are examples of very strong trademarks.

II.  Copyright

Copyright issues start to come into play when you publish material created by others on your blog or, conversely, when someone else republishes material that you posted on your blog or website.

Copyright law applies to the reposting of text, images, audio and video.  If you’re posting somebody else’s original work, you’re likely violating one of the exclusive rights mentioned above. But as you, me and anyone else on the Internet knows, people are copy/pasting, hyperlinking and cross-referencing all over the world, all the time.  Are they all liable for copyright infringement? Luckily, the Copyright Act has a built-in exception called “fair use” that allows you to use other people’s copyrighted works for certain, enumerated purposes.  These include criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research.  So, for example, if you are commenting on or criticizing an item that someone else has posted, and use a quote from that source, that’s probably fair use.

The following factors are considered in a fair use analysis:

  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Keep in mind that the law favors “transformative” use.  In other words, if you’re reposting another person’s original work, it’s more likely to be fair use if you’re using that work in a different manner or for a different purpose than the original.  While you may borrow directly from another source, adding your own commentary and content is better than strict copying.  Likewise, it’s better to repost only a small portion of someone else’s work than the work in its entirety.

If you feel that you’ve gone too far in your copying, you probably have.  Consider whether you’re able to share the same information but in a different way (i.e. your own words).  If you can’t, that’s strong evidence it’s a fair use.  Don’t worry if you’re confused…this is a gray area in copyright law that isn’t totally clear to anyone at the moment.  If you have specific questions about your use of someone else’s creative works or someone else is using your works, contact a copyright professional (who should be well-versed on legal developments and what typically constitutes fair use) to provide a more detailed analysis.

Also, on a practical note, if you’re using someone else’s text or images and they contact you to ask you to remove them, you probably just want to go ahead and do it.  After all, there are lots of different ways to express an idea and usually hundreds of equally wonderful pictures to adorn your blog.  On the other side, if you find someone else using your text or images, take a deep breath before contacting them and remember what Barney says about sharing:

III. Trademark

Let’s talk first about your own trademarks.  Often you’ll have spent good time and money developing and protecting your trademarks.  It would be a shame to lose your rights through improper use.  Proper use enhances a mark’s ability to identify the origin of products or services, and minimizes the likelihood that a mark will become generic, or be abandoned unintentionally.  Make sure you always use a proper trademark notice (™ for common law rights, ® if you’ve obtained registration) and remember to use your trademark as an adjective. Escalator was once a registered trademark but rights were lost when everyone started using the term as a noun to describe just any ol’ moving stairway.  The mark no longer brought to mind its owner as the single origin of the product.

It’s probably just as common that you’ll post someone else’s trademark…I know this blog, as a news and information source, posts 3rd-party trademarks fairly regularly.  This is typically permissible, because while trademark law prevents you from using someone else’s trademark to sell your competing products, it doesn’t stop you from using the trademark to refer to the trademark owner or its products. That is called “nominative fair use,” and is permitted if using the trademark is necessary to identify the products, services, or company you’re talking about, and you don’t use the mark to suggest the company endorses you.  Again, bloggers get by on an exception to the rule…we are living in a gray legal realm.  Consult a trademark professional if you’re concerned about your use of somebody else’s trademark.

trademarknotice

The next post in the series will be A Legal Primer for Bloggers: Defamation.  The post will explore your options when somebody has posted something false and damaging about you, including some common defenses.  Until next time, sticks and stones, my friends!

A Legal Primer for Bloggers

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Part 3: Defamation

Part 4: Anonymity

Part 5: Privacy

Eli Lilly Named Best Company for Blacks in Technology

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Company has been given the Epsilon “Star of Highest Magnitude” Award and has been named the best company for blacks in technology by the Black Data Processing Associates (BDPA) and WorkplaceDiversity.com. The Epsilon Award is given annually to the top company in the nation that promotes a workplace and environment that supports the advancement of African-Americans in the information technology industry.

lillylogo“We are thrilled and honored to have received this award,” said Michael Heim, senior vice president of information technology and chief information officer, at Lilly. “This award is proof that Lilly has made, and will continue to make, choices that support our dedication to diversity and ultimately offer better solutions for our employees and patients.”

Lilly received the Epsilon Award at the BDPA’s annual national conference which was held this month in Raleigh, North Carolina. The first pharmaceutical company to win top honors, this was the fourth consecutive year Lilly was listed as one of the top companies for blacks in technology.

According to the BDPA, a company must attract and recruit the most talented employees, clients and customers as well as realize positive financial results to be considered for this award. Eligible companies also submit a survey related to workforce and supplier diversity within the organization.

Source: Eli Lilly

Electronic Arts in Trademark Battle Against John Dillinger’s Estate

Court Case Number: 5:09-cv-03965-HRL

File Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009

Plaintiff: Electronic Arts, Inc.

Plaintiff Counsel: R. Adam Lauridsen, R. James Slaughter of Keker & Van Nest LLP

Defendant: Dillinger, LLC

Cause: Trademark Infringement

Court: California Northern District Court

Judge: Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd

Video game mega-company Electronic Arts filed suit last week in the US District Court of Northern California against Indiana-based Dillinger, LLC, over the in-game use of a pair of weapons bearing the famed criminal’s moniker.  Specifically, the firearms in question are the “Dillinger Tommy Gun” found in The Godfather and the “Modern Dillinger” available in The Godfather II.

dillingerEA is seeking a declaratory judgment that its use of John Dillinger’s name does not violate Dillinger’s rights.  The complaint alleges that on July 22 (exactly 75 years after the bank robber was gunned down by the FBI in Chicago, mind you) Dillinger contacted EA threatening legal action if the publisher did not agree to pay “millions of dollars for the game elements purportedly covered by its publicity rights and trademarks.”

Dillinger’s claim stems from Indiana’s Right of Publicity statute that protects against unauthorized commercial use of a person’s personality for 100 years after his or her death. EA, on the other hand, contends that its use of Dillinger’s name in The Godfather games is protected under the First Amendment, and it does not violate any claimed rights of publicity or trademarks held by Dillinger, LLC.

With a recent Dillinger movie starring Johnny Depp, it’s no shock that Dillinger, LLC would be looking to shore up it’s IP portfolio.  Whether EA’s alleged infringement justifies a demand of “millions of dollars” is questionable.  I doubt Dillinger expected EA to settle for anything near that amount.  Maybe Dillinger’s legal team has just been looking for a good opportunity to test the limits of Indiana’s Right of Publicity law.  The same legal team represents the estates of several prominent deceased celebrities, so the outcome here could have important repercussions in other matters.

Either way, the Indiana Intellectual Property & Technology Blog will keep you updated.

Source: Gamespot

Indiana Patent Litigation Update – Rosco Inc. v. Velvac Inc.

Tags

,

Court Case Number: 3:09-cv-00395-PPS-CAN

File Date: Friday, August 28, 2009

Plaintiff: Rosco Inc.

Plaintiff Counsel: David B. Bassett of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Defendant:Velvac Inc.

Cause: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

Court:Indiana Northern District Court

Judge: Judge Philip P. Simon

Referred To: Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Velvac logo

A patent infringement case involving two companies that make school bus mirrors.  Let the good times roll.