Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Coach, Inc. v. Designer Fragrance

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Coach, Inc. et al v. Designer Fragrance & Gifts et al

Coach makes handbags, wallets, etc. . Defendant is accused of selling knockoffs from a retail store in Jeffersonville, Indiana. As you can see from the claims below, Coach has decided to throw the kitchen sink at Defendant.

Leave a comment for a full copy of the complaint.

Related case: Coach, Inc. et al v. Diggz Clothing LLC et al

Related case: Coach, Inc. et al v. TJ’s Handbags

Related case: Coach Inc. et al v. Tom’s Treasure Chest

Court Case Number: 4:10-cv-00112-TWP-WGH
File Date: Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Plaintiff: Coach, Inc., Coach Services, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Alejandro Valle of Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan LLP
Defendant: Designer Fragrance & Gifts, Loretta M. Beckner
Cause: Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement, Trade Dress Infringement, False Designation of Origin and False Advertising, Trademark Dilution, Copyright Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – JB Custom Inc. v. Amadeo Rossi SA et al

Tags

, , , , , , ,

JB Custom Inc. v. Amadeo Rossi SA et al

Plaintiff is a custom firearms manufacturer. Defendants allegedly sells firearms similar to those of Plaintiff in violation of trademark laws and in breach of an Exclusivity Agreement.

For more, see the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette.

Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00326-PPS -RBC
File Date: Monday, September 20, 2010
Plaintiff: JB Custom Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Jeremy N. Gayed of Barrett & McNagny LLP
Defendants: Amadeo Rossi SA, Forjas Taurus SA, Taurus International Manufacturing Inc., Braztech International LC
Cause: Breach of Contract, Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Passing Off, False Advertising, Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Chief Judge Philip P. Simon
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey

Indiana scientist accused of stealing trade secrets

Companies, are you protecting your valuable trade secrets? When was the last time you revisited your trade secret policy? A cautionary tale…Indianapolis-based Dow AgroSciences was recently the victim of an alleged “patient and calculated” plan to “drain” the company of technology that took 20 years to develop.

A former Indiana scientist accused of illegally sending trade secrets worth $300 million to China and Germany was ordered detained Tuesday on rare charges of economic espionage.

A federal indictment unsealed in Indianapolis alleges that 45-year-old Kexue Huang, who was born in China, passed on proprietary information about the development of organic pesticides to Hunan Normal University while he worked as a researcher for Dow AgroSciences in Indiana from 2003 to 2008.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Cynthia Ridgeway said Huang, a Canadian citizen with permanent U.S. resident status, used a “patient and calculated” plan to “drain” the Indianapolis-based company of technology that took 20 years to develop.

The indictment alleges that Huang published a paper in China about the organic pesticides and also directed students at Hunan Normal in further research.

Source: Associated Press (August 31, 2010)

For more information on protecting your valuable trade secrets: Creating a Trade Secret Policy

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Arbor Home Building Corporation v. Miller Custom Homes LLC

Tags

, ,

Arbor Home Building Corporation v. Miller Custom Homes LLC

Both parties are homebuilders. Defendant allegedly built a home substantially similar to Plaintiff’s architectural drawings, which are protectable under copyright law.

For a full copy of the Complaint, leave a comment.

Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00316-PPS -RBC
File Date: Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Plaintiff: Arbor Home Building Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Angela G. Garcia, James B. Hike, Jeremy V. Senk of Carson Boxberger LLP
Defendant: Miller Custom Homes LLC
Cause: Copyright Infringement by Reproduction, Copyright Infringement by Preparation of Derivative Work
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Chief Judge Philip P. Simon
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey

Protecting your Website’s “Look and Feel”

There’s a nice analysis in the New York Law Journal about intellectual property protection of the “look and feel” of a website:

Protectable trade dress under the Lanham Act can include a wide range of product design and packaging features: the color and shape of pill capsules; the look of a greeting card line; the layout of magazine covers and briefcases; commercial kiosk designs; sales techniques; the distinctive decor of a restaurant; and the colorful, tropical depictions on liquor bottles. Separate from a trademark, trade dress involves the total image of a product and the overall impression created that allows consumers to distinguish among competing producers.

In recent years, a growing debate has emerged over whether the overall “look and feel” of a website can be protected. To be sure, online content, videos, and other media are copyrightable, but the law remains unsettled when it comes to using trademark law to protect a site’s distinctive interface and design elements.

This article discusses trade dress generally, the issue of copyright preemption, and recent decisions that have wrestled with the issue of website trade dress infringement.

Click here for the article.