Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Dillinger, LLC v. Pour House of Lincoln, Inc. et al

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Dillinger, LLC v. Pour House of Lincoln, Inc. et al

Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00714-WTL-TAB
File Date:    Thursday, May 24, 2012
Plaintiff:     Dillinger, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel:     Steven G. Cracraft, Patricia A. Hughel of Brannon Robinson Sowers Hughel & Doss PC
Defendant:     Pour House of Lincoln, Inc., Mary Olsen, William Olsen, Donald Druse
Cause:   Demand for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, Federal Trademark Infringement, Cybersquatting, False Designation of Origin, False Description, Unfair Competition, Dilution by Blurring
Court:    Southern District of Indiana
Judge:     Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

Stories from the Week that Was – 5/13/12-5/19/12

Tags

, ,

Kodak Had a Secret Nuclear Reactor Loaded With Enriched Uranium Hidden In a Basement

Google revamps search, tries to think more like a person

McDonald’s tries to rebrand itself, in Berkeley, of all places

“No backroom deals to regulate the Internet. Speak out now against TPP, the new ACTA.” – Electronic Frontier Foundation

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – The Mainstreet Collection Inc. v. The Main Street Collection LLC

Tags

, , , ,

The Mainstreet Collection Inc. v. The Main Street Collection LLC et al

Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00672-SEB-MJD
File Date:    Thursday, May 17, 2012
Plaintiff:     The Mainstreet Collection Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel:     Anthony J. Biller, Emily M. Haas of Coats & Bennett
Thomas W. Blessing of Frazier & Associates
Defendant:     The Main Street Collection LLC, Melissa Card
Cause:    Trademark Infringement, Cybersquatting
Court:    Southern District of Indiana
Judge:     Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore

Yet Another Trademark Monitoring Service Solicitation

Information in a U.S. trademark application is public record. As such, it has become commonplace to receive a batch of unofficial trademark solicitations within weeks after filing. One such solicitation received recently is shown below. These types of documents may be immediately be sent to your attorney for deposit in his/her waste bin. I routinely tell my clients that all official correspondence should come through me or, on rare occasion, the United States Patent and Trademark Office. All other inquiries/communications/solicitations are likely spam.

The USPTO is aware of the growing number of unofficial solicitations, and recently released a Warning from the USPTO Concerning Unofficial Trademark Solicitations.

Stories from the Week that Was – 5/6/12-5/12/12

Tags

, , ,

A mid-week election saw Richard Mourdock topple long-standing Republican Senator Richard Lugar. Has anybody bothered to ask Mourdock or (Democrat rival) Joe Donnelly’s thoughts on legislation like CISPA and SNOPA? Not this week, when all the talk was about Zuckerberg’s hoodie and President Obama’s evolution on same-sex marriage.

Why the New gTLDs Don’t Matter

Clicking ‘Like’ on Facebook Is Not Protected Speech, Judge Rules

Property rights in the cloud: Your data or theirs?

Twitter Defends User In Court Over Occupy Tweets

Think That Email Isn’t a Contract? Think Again

Facebook bans Grooveshark over copyright complaint

How Should We Measure Damages for Defamation Over Social Media?

Mars Rover Opportunity Rolling Again After Winter Break

New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers

“All of my friends who have younger siblings who are going to college or high school – my number one piece of advice is: You should learn how to program.” – Mark Zuckerberg