Tags
Copyright Infringement, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Masterfile Corporation v. Kemp Title Agency, Tim A. Baker
Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Masterfile Corporation v. Kemp Title Agency
Masterfile strikes again.
Masterfile is a stock photography company which acquires and licenses images for commercial use. Defendant allegedly displayed Masterfile’s images on their website without compensating Masterfile. Defendant was given an opportunity to enter into a retroactive licensing agreement but refused.
Update 1/6/11 – The parties have reached a settlement and filed a Stipulation of Dismissal (see below). The terms of the settlement are not public but each side has paid its own legal fees.
Related Case: Masterfile Corporation v. Mark Stein
Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00997-JMS-TAB
File Date: Monday, August 09, 2010
Plaintiff: Masterfile Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Aaron M. Staser of Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant: Kemp Title Agency, LLC
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker
Complaint:
Stipulation of Dismissal:
There is a doctrine of “fair use” in trademark law, but it deals more with third-party use of another company’s trademarks for advertising or nominative uses rather than the ability to use similar trademark elements. One pillar of trademark law, which surprisingly is rarely mentioned, is the avoidance of consumer confusion. When people see the “swoosh”, they know they’re purchasing a high-quality product from Nike Inc. If every shoe company, particularly those that create poor quality products, started using a swoosh, a consumer would no longer be able to identify high-quality products with the swoosh trademark.