• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Intellectual Property

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

06 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Bloggers, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media, Stories from the Week that Was, Tech Developments, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BitTorrent, Occupy Wall Street

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

Protecting Your Online Reputation: 4 Things You Need to Know

Major Book Publisher Files Mass-BitTorrent Lawsuit

Occupy Wall Street applies for trademark

Just how big is 7 billion?

People Who Use Macs At Work Are Richer And More Productive


– WIPO IP Facts and Figures 2011

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Eli Lilly v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic

05 Saturday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Tim A. Baker, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Eli Lilly and Company v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd. et al

Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-01469-JMS-TAB
File Date: Friday, November 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Jan M. Carroll of Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant: Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd.
Petvetshop Pty Ltd.
Paul Sorensen
Dr. Cymantha Sorensen
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

View this document on Scribd

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/23-10/29/11

30 Sunday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Entertainment Law, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media, Stories from the Week that Was, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/23-10/29/11

How Recruiters Use Social Networks to Screen Candidates

Startup Funding by the Numbers [INFOGRAPHIC]

Piracy and Copyright Challenges in 1841 Mirror Those of Today

The Future Of Music Business Models (And Those Who Are Already There)

Tips for Defending Allegations of Domain Name and Trademark Cybersquatting

Long Island Couple files Trademark Application for Occupy Wall St.

US government requests for Google user data grow 29%

Law School Admissions Officers Are Googling Applicants and Checking Them Out on Facebook

“OH WOW. OH WOW. OH WOW.” – Steve Jobs final words, via A Sister’s Eulogy for Steve Jobs

More questions about LiTEBOX: Trademark Fraud?

28 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Branding, Indiana, Indianapolis, Intellectual Property, Tech Developments, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Greg Ballard, Mitch Daniels

When new companies come to Indianapolis promising tech jobs, particularly as part of a joint announcement with the Governor and Mayor, I like to check our their trademark portfolio and make sure all is in order. Apparently in the excitement of watching Michael Jordan highlights on top of semis or receiving multi-million dollar tax abatements, LiTEBOX has added the federal trademark registration notice, ®, to their Facebook page despite not owning a valid trademark registration. This could cause LiTEBOX trademark problems now (fraud) or later (inability to protect their mark based on this earlier fraud).

“Improper use of the federal registration symbol, ®, that is deliberate and intends to deceive or mislead the public or the USPTO is fraud.” Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure 906.04

In addition, LiTEBOX at some point is going to have to reconcile their use of the trademark with the owners of this trademark application:

Trademark considerations may seem small given all of the other questions that have been raised about LiTEBOX, but let’s hope they find good IP counsel soon to get their trademark situation sorted before it results in a big headache.

To everyone else, this is a good reminder to scan your marketing materials and online platforms for improper use of a trademark notice.

Long Island Couple files Trademark Application for OCCUPY WALL ST.

24 Monday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Occupy Wall Street

It was just a matter of time before capitalism found a way to make profit off the Occupy movement. IP carbetbaggers have now begun moving in to lay claim to their piece of the revolution. A couple in Long Island, New York, has recently filed a trademark application for “OCCUPY WALL ST.” in connection with all sorts of fun retail items ranging from bumper stickers to sport bags to footwear.

A few practical trademark lessons can be learned here. First, register your trademarks or someone else will. If your organization has a trademark if doesn’t want registered by some t-shirt dealer in Long Island, be sure to file your own application first. I’m not sure exactly who would be the appropriate applicant for the OCCUPY WALL ST. trademark but I’m pretty sure it’s not this couple.

That being said, the more important lesson from this story requires me to wish good luck to these trademark applicants who have now taken on the legal obligation to enforce their OCCUPY WALL ST. trademark. If an infringer of a mark is known to the trademark owner (or should have been known through routine diligence) and is allowed to go unchallenged, the trademark owner can lose its trademark. In other words, this couple now has to start enforcing (via Cease & Desist letters, UDRP actions, trademark litigation, etc.) their OCCUPY WALL ST. trademark against the masses in Liberty Plaza and around the world. I’d love to shake hands with the lawyer who takes up that case. The obligation to protect one’s registered trademarks is a simple but valuable lesson that most self-filers don’t ever receive.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...