• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Indiana

Indiana Patent Litigation Update – Rosco Inc. v. Velvac Inc.

02 Wednesday Sep 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Patent

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Christopher A. Nuechterlein, Philip P. Simon

Court Case Number: 3:09-cv-00395-PPS-CAN

File Date: Friday, August 28, 2009

Plaintiff: Rosco Inc.

Plaintiff Counsel: David B. Bassett of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Defendant:Velvac Inc.

Cause: 28:1338 Patent Infringement

Court:Indiana Northern District Court

Judge: Judge Philip P. Simon

Referred To: Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein

Velvac logo

A patent infringement case involving two companies that make school bus mirrors.  Let the good times roll.

A Legal Primer for Bloggers – Introduction

01 Tuesday Sep 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Bloggers, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Social Media, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

blogindianaI recently attended Blog Indiana 2009, a 3-day blogging and social media conference that aimed to promote education, innovation and collaboration among Indiana’s fast-growing blogging community.  The conference was very informative and had an extraordinary turnout.  However, despite all the great information we were getting, it became clear that a lot of legal issues were going unanswered (or un-asked).  Being the only attorney in the packed room, that wasn’t totally surprising.  However, knowing that these issues are important for every blogger to at least consider, I’ve decided to prepare a series of posts dealing specifically with the legal issues that bloggers should be thinking about.

My idea to write these posts was reinforced last week when news came out about a recent case where a court granted a plaintiff’s request to force Google to reveal the e-mail address and IP address of an anonymous blogger who allegedly defamed the plaintiff.  Clearly a big hit against anonymous blogging…more on that in a future post.

EFF-logo-transFirst things first, if you want the ultimate source for information on bloggers’ rights, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (“EFF”) excellent FAQ series.  If you’re a blogger and not yet familiar with EFF, you should be.  After all, they’ve been doing you a world of good for the last two decades.  Quick intro…the Electronic Frontier Foundation is an international non-profit advocacy and legal organization dedicated to preserving the right to freedom of speech in the context of today’s digital age.  I have several friends over at EFF and they’re all top-notch people with top-notch legal minds doing top-notch legal work.  ‘Nuff said about that.  On with the info that you want:

Bloggers’ Legal Issues

Bloggers, while hailing from a variety of political, economic and social backgrounds, all have one thing in common…they’ve got something to say.  From cake recipes to motherhood to Indiana Intellectual Property updates, the constant is that bloggers have something to say, often regardless of the size or stature of their audience.  Blogs have provided a great forum for publishing directly to an interested public.  As such, a blogger needs to consider the same legal issues as anyone making a widely-available publication.  Specifically, the astute blogger will want to at least be familiar with:

  • Intellectual Property (Copyright, Trademark)
  • Defamation (Truth as Defense, Public v. Private Figures)
  • Anonymity (First Amendment Protection, Subpoenas)
  • Privacy (Publication of Private Information, “Newsworthy” Information)

Keep in mind that laws vary from state to state.

While the Constitution and federal laws, such as copyright law, apply nationwide, many laws that affect bloggers vary from state to state. For example, defamation and privacy laws are defined by each state.  This blog series will focus on Indiana’s laws, but bloggers should consider checking the law of their jurisdiction (or ask an attorney to look into it for you.)

What about those crazy comments?

Generally, you have a First Amendment right to publish your blog in the way that you want, which includes the right to choose who may participate in discussions on your blog.  That means you’re able to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.  But always be conscientious when removing someone else’s voice from the dialogue…with great power comes great responsibility.

With that general introduction out of the way, the next post in the series will be: A Legal Primer for Bloggers: Intellectual Property.  The post will help you understand your rights to link to information or graphics from other sources, quote from articles and blogs, or otherwise use someone else’s copyrighted works.  It will also discuss the appropriate use of trademarks in blogs (both yours and 3rd-party marks).

More on EFF – EFF is a donor-funded nonprofit and depends on your support to continue successfully defending your digital rights. Litigation is particularly expensive; two-thirds of EFF’s budget comes from individual donors, so every contribution is critical to helping EFF fight — and win — more cases.  Want to know how EFF has already helped?  EFF has taken action in several ways; it provides or funds legal defense in court, defends individuals and new technologies from the chilling effects of what it considers baseless or misdirected legal threats, provides guidance to the government and courts, organizes political action and mass mailings, supports some new technologies which it believes preserve personal freedoms, maintains a database and web sites of related news and information, monitors and challenges potential legislation that it believes would infringe on personal liberties and fair use, and solicits a list of what it considers patent abuses with intentions to defeat those that it considers without merit.

A Legal Primer for Bloggers

Part 1: INTRODUCTION

Part 2: Intellectual Property

Part 3: Defamation

Part 4: Anonymity

Part 5: Privacy

Indianapolis Chosen as U.S. Center for Hacking Research

31 Monday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Press Release – The international non-profit, security research institute ISECOM has chosen Indianapolis as their U.S. base for projects and research.  ISECOM is best known for freely providing the OSSTMM, a worldwide standard methodology for security testing which is used to hack computer systems, trick people, and get around home security sensors and alarms to test their effectiveness.

Indiana native, Chris Griffin, is responsible for getting ISECOM to come here. Griffin got involved with ISECOM in 2004 as a volunteer and worked his way to being a core team member where he assisted writing the Hacking Exposed Linux third edition. He then took the next step and flew to Barcelona, Spain, for a “train the trainer” session where security experts fly in from all over the world to attend an extremely intensive 3 day bootcamp of 16 hour days to pass 4 exams of 4 hours each. Certified in security testing and analysis, this qualified Griffin as an accredited ISECOM trainer, one of just 5 in the USA.

isecomlogo“I was working as a government contractor in security and I just couldn’t believe it when I saw this incredibly new direction in Internet Security that was so effective and here we were still making the same mistakes by focusing on products instead of solutions,” says Griffin. “So I just knew we had to get that knowledge out to others here in the U.S. as quickly as possible.”

Griffin is not the first American to be impressed with ISECOM. Organizations such as the Department of Justice, FBI, NSA, and all the military branches have used the OSSTMM for security tests and have even trained some of their people. Companies like Walmart, Disney, IBM, and Intel have also trained people and applied the ISECOM methodology.

“Even the Vatican got their people trained,” says Griffin. “ISECOM know-how is in big demand but there was almost nobody here who can bring it. So I’m doing it.”

Griffin thinks bringing the ISECOM projects and research to Indiana is advantageous for the state in this knowledge economy since so much focus is needed to securing intellectual property. Therefore he is talking to other security organizations, government, and universities for collaboration. He will be teaching his first official class in OSSTMM Professional Security Analysis (OPSA) the week of September 21st at the new Public Agency Training Council building of Indianapolis. The class focuses on “critical security thinking and analysis”. According to ISECOM (isecom.org), much of the security models currently in use are built from best practices which have a way of not being best for everyone. The OPSA teaches people how to investigate, deconstruct, and measure the security of anything to assure it has the unique, and optimum solution it needs.

Griffin is also extending the ISECOM project, Hacker Highschool, to Indiana, which teaches teens resourcefulness and critical security thinking through hacking. The project provides schools free lesson books and access to a safe, hacker playground, a test network specifically for experimentation.

“We can’t turn away from the curiosity these kids have about hacking and expect them to just drop it,” said Pete Herzog, the Managing Director of ISECOM, in a BBC interview. “We need to harness that enthusiasm and help them learn, guide them, and let them understand there are responsibilities and consequences that come with that kind of knowledge.”

Indiana high schools who want to get involved in the Hacker Highschool project or security professionals who are interested in the upcoming OPSA class should contact Griffin.

Source: Newswire Today

Indiana and Purdue Set Aside Rivalry To Combat Common Enemy – Beer

28 Friday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Indiana and Purdue universities have joined a coalition of colleges calling for Anheuser-Busch InBev to stop selling its Bud Light “fan can,” a regular-size aluminum can of beer decked out in school colors, in college towns across the nation.  The schools’ “cease & desist” claims range from trademark infringement to a negative impact on school efforts to curb binge and underage drinking.  The cans have no college logos, names or other identifiers — just 27 color combinations.

Will the King of Beers stand up to the schools?  We’ll see.  Bud seems to be backing down in some situations and removing their cans from surrounding areas.

Can anyone near one of these schools send pictures of these cans?  Thanks!

Go over to Indy Star for the full story.

budlight

Indiana Inventor Sues Over Food-Heating Invention

26 Wednesday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Patent

≈ Leave a comment

An Indiana inventor says his invention to speed the microwave oven heating of frozen foods was stolen from him by Birds Eye Foods and Clorox Co.

birdseyelogoIn a suit filed in Scott County Superior Court, Gary Hopkins is seeking unspecified damages from the companies, which he claims ignored confidentiality agreements on his patented system using plastic containers with pinholes and steam vents to cut in half the time needed to microwave frozen food.

Clorox Logo

Hopkins claims Birds Eye and Clorox, parent company of GladWare food containers, introduced identical products after seeing his work and refusing to pay him.

I haven’t seen the complaint yet (anyone down in Scott County want to send me a copy?) but the lawsuit apparently has claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment and misappropriation of trade secrets.  No mention of patent infringement, although Hopkins has several related patents:

Hopkins patents

The Indiana Intellectual Property blog will keep you updated.  Follow the link below for the full story, including an interview with Mr. Hopkins.

Source: Indy Star

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (328)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (605)
  • Indianapolis (52)
  • Intellectual Property (664)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (597)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (216)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (370)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (365)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...