• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Copyright

Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Summary – September 2010

11 Monday Oct 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update

The following Intellectual Property cases were filed in September 2010. A busy month, up from just 2 in August. Stay tuned for updates.

Northern District of Indiana

  • Forest River Inc. v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC (Trade Secret)
  • Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Trioak Inc. et al (Copyright)
  • JB Custom Inc. v. Amadeo Rossi SA et al (Copyright)
  • Arbor Home Building Corporation v. Miller Custom Homes LLC (Copyright)
  • Group Force Capital LLC v. Virtuoso Distillers LLC (Trademark)

Southern District of Indiana

  • Net Pro Trading Card Company, LLC v. Ace Authentic Sports memorabilia, LLC et al (Trademark)
  • Coach, Inc. et al v. Designer Fragrance & Gifts et al (Trademark)
  • Coach, Inc. et al v. TJ’s Handbags & More et al (Trademark)
  • Aire Serv Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Mark Niemann (Trademark)

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Broadcast Music Inc. v. Trioak Inc.

06 Wednesday Oct 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Musicians, Northern District of Indiana, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Joseph S. Van Bokkelen, Litigation Update, Paul R. Cherry

Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Trioak Inc. et al

Defendant played 12 songs in his Crown Point establishment, R House of Brews, without a license from BMI, one of three main performance royalty organizations (along w/ ASCAP and SESAC). BMI claims to be caused “great” and “incalculable” damage. Actually, it’s probably about $0.25/song in the jukebox, but we know what they’re saying. While BMI seems like a cranky giant, it’s actually doing this on behalf of all of the artists it represents. Otherwise, nobody collects money and artists have to bring these lawsuits themselves.

Here are the songs allegedly infringed (listen to FULL PLAYLIST):

  1. Bye Bye Love – Everly Brothers
  2. A Country Boy Can Survive – Hank Williams Jr.
  3. Gimme Three Steps – Lynyrd Skynyrd
  4. Midnight Rider – Allman Brothers
  5. Rocky Mountain Way – Joe Walsh
  6. Take Me To The River – Al Green
  7. Who’ll Stop the Rain – Creedence Clearwater Revival
  8. She Thinks My Tractor’s Sexy – Kenny Chesney
  9. Loser – Three Doors Down
  10. Ring of Fire – Johnny Cash
  11. I Love This Bar – Toby Keith
  12. Gunpowder and Lead – Miranda Lambert

Court Case Number: 2:10-cv-00380-JVB -PRC
File Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music Inc
House of Bryant Publications LLC
Bocephus Music Inc
Songs of Universal Inc
EMI Virgin Songs Inc
Elijah Blue Music
Unichappell Music Inc
Barn-Storm Music Inc
Belkin Music
Al Green Music Inc
Rondor Music International Inc
Concord Music Group Inc
EMI Blackwood Music Inc
Scarlet Moon Music Inc
Jelinda Music
Escatawpa Songs
Painted Desert Music Corporation
Sony/ATV Songs LLC
Big Yellow Dog LLC
Tokeco Tunes
Nashville Star Music
Carnival Music Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Peter J. Prettyman of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
Defendant: Trioak Inc., Anthony S. Robledo
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Arbor Home Building Corporation v. Miller Custom Homes LLC

15 Wednesday Sep 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Philip P. Simon, Roger B. Cosbey

Arbor Home Building Corporation v. Miller Custom Homes LLC

Both parties are homebuilders. Defendant allegedly built a home substantially similar to Plaintiff’s architectural drawings, which are protectable under copyright law.

For a full copy of the Complaint, leave a comment.

Court Case Number: 1:10-cv-00316-PPS -RBC
File Date: Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Plaintiff: Arbor Home Building Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Angela G. Garcia, James B. Hike, Jeremy V. Senk of Carson Boxberger LLP
Defendant: Miller Custom Homes LLC
Cause: Copyright Infringement by Reproduction, Copyright Infringement by Preparation of Derivative Work
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Chief Judge Philip P. Simon
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey

View this document on Scribd

Protecting your Website’s “Look and Feel”

15 Wednesday Sep 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Bloggers, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Social Media, Tech Developments, Trademark, What I'm Reading

≈ Leave a comment

There’s a nice analysis in the New York Law Journal about intellectual property protection of the “look and feel” of a website:

Protectable trade dress under the Lanham Act can include a wide range of product design and packaging features: the color and shape of pill capsules; the look of a greeting card line; the layout of magazine covers and briefcases; commercial kiosk designs; sales techniques; the distinctive decor of a restaurant; and the colorful, tropical depictions on liquor bottles. Separate from a trademark, trade dress involves the total image of a product and the overall impression created that allows consumers to distinguish among competing producers.

In recent years, a growing debate has emerged over whether the overall “look and feel” of a website can be protected. To be sure, online content, videos, and other media are copyrightable, but the law remains unsettled when it comes to using trademark law to protect a site’s distinctive interface and design elements.

This article discusses trade dress generally, the issue of copyright preemption, and recent decisions that have wrestled with the issue of website trade dress infringement.

Click here for the article.

Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation Summary – August 2010

01 Wednesday Sep 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

The following Intellectual Property cases were filed in August 2010. A quiet month considering 6 cases were filed in July.

Northern District of Indiana

Trans-United Inc. v. Trans-United Inc.

Southern District of Indiana

Masterfile Corporation v. Kemp Title Agency

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...