• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Indiana and Purdue Set Aside Rivalry To Combat Common Enemy – Beer

28 Friday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Indiana and Purdue universities have joined a coalition of colleges calling for Anheuser-Busch InBev to stop selling its Bud Light “fan can,” a regular-size aluminum can of beer decked out in school colors, in college towns across the nation.  The schools’ “cease & desist” claims range from trademark infringement to a negative impact on school efforts to curb binge and underage drinking.  The cans have no college logos, names or other identifiers — just 27 color combinations.

Will the King of Beers stand up to the schools?  We’ll see.  Bud seems to be backing down in some situations and removing their cans from surrounding areas.

Can anyone near one of these schools send pictures of these cans?  Thanks!

Go over to Indy Star for the full story.

budlight

Indiana Inventor Sues Over Food-Heating Invention

26 Wednesday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Patent

≈ Leave a comment

An Indiana inventor says his invention to speed the microwave oven heating of frozen foods was stolen from him by Birds Eye Foods and Clorox Co.

birdseyelogoIn a suit filed in Scott County Superior Court, Gary Hopkins is seeking unspecified damages from the companies, which he claims ignored confidentiality agreements on his patented system using plastic containers with pinholes and steam vents to cut in half the time needed to microwave frozen food.

Clorox Logo

Hopkins claims Birds Eye and Clorox, parent company of GladWare food containers, introduced identical products after seeing his work and refusing to pay him.

I haven’t seen the complaint yet (anyone down in Scott County want to send me a copy?) but the lawsuit apparently has claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment and misappropriation of trade secrets.  No mention of patent infringement, although Hopkins has several related patents:

Hopkins patents

The Indiana Intellectual Property blog will keep you updated.  Follow the link below for the full story, including an interview with Mr. Hopkins.

Source: Indy Star

What I’m Reading – The World Is Open: How Web Technology is Revolutionizing Education

25 Tuesday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Indiana, Tech Developments, What I'm Reading

≈ Leave a comment

On top of all the blogs, law journals, and case updates that I read each day, I also make sure to set aside time to read one Intellectual Property or Tech law book each month.  When I find a book that might be useful for clients, I post it:

worldisopenThe World Is Open: How Web Technology is Revolutionizing Education by Curtis J. Bonk, a professor of instructional systems technology at Indiana University.

Technology is changing higher education in more ways than can be counted. Distance education has become common. Leading universities are putting course materials or even entire courses online — free. The Obama plan for community colleges envisions free online courses that could be used nationwide. Professor Bonk surveys this landscape in this new book.

Click here for a full interview w/ Prof. Bonk discussing such topics as the “open” educational movement, online courses, anger at wikis and the future of higher education.

Electronic Signatures on Online Forms

24 Monday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in KLF Legal, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

The following is a guest post I wrote for FormSpring’s blog a few weeks back re: Electronic Signatures on Online Forms.  FormSpring provides organizations with an easy way to build web forms that integrate with their websites without any programming, software, or special skills.

formspringlogo

FormSpring customers often ask about collecting electronic signatures via FormSpring’s web forms. Here are some examples of the types of questions customers are asking:

  • Does your product offer a way to do verifiable signatures? My client wants to post job applications online which will need this functionality.
  • Our company is looking to add an online enrollment form with an electronic signature on our web site. Is this something you can help with?
  • We have a contract that we want to get up online but are not sure of the most efficient way to do it. The majority of it is in a word document and we’d like to add payment integration and some contact info input and a digital signature.
  • We have a waiver, disclamer, and legal notice that we need to have a digital signature on before they submit payment via PayPal. Can I do this?

FormSpring does a wonderful technical job of making these options available to their customers, and I’ll leave it to them to explain how they work their magic. But they’ve asked that I help explain the legality/enforceability of electronic signatures. Ultimately, being legal or enforceable means that a court would accept an electronic signature collected via your form as admissible trial evidence should there ever be a dispute that requires court intervention.

First, I’ll preface this post by saying that Adobe previously ran an excellent series of blog posts on the topic of electronic signatures. These posts are definitely worth a read if you’re interested in more information on electronic signatures:

  1. “So what is an electronic signature anyway?“
  2. “Trust Us!” – Electronic Signatures and Assurance
  3. “This is legal, right?” – Electronic Signatures & The Law

I’ll address some of those points here as they pertain to web forms. First, what is an electronic signature, and how does it differ from a traditional pen-to-paper signature? Obviously it’s electronic and not ink, but there’s more to it than that…or is there?

In commerce and the law, a signature on a document is an indication that the person adopts the intentions recorded in the document. Accordingly, an electronic signature is any legally recognized electronic means that indicates that a person adopts the contents of an electronic message.

The historical legal concept of “signature” is broader. It recognizes any mark made with the intention of authenticating the marked document. Hence, an “X” can often suffice as a proper signature.

Courts will accept an “electronic signature” as a “signature” so long as it meets the definition set forth by precedent and law (in other words, the definition varies by jurisdiction). An electronic signature and a pen-to-paper signature are equivalent in most respects, and can admissible in trial.

That being said, all signatures (whether electronic or old-school) intended to be entered into evidence in a trial need to be assessed for “admissibility.” Some of the threshold evidentiary questions are: Does it represent the intent of the signatory? Has the document/form been altered? Who had the right to sign this document/form? How was the signature derived, and what controlled access to the document for its signature? These questions come into play no matter the type of signature.

Higher assurance signature methods that better authenticate the signatory, such as encryption or username/password requirements, are more likely to be accepted than signature technologies which provide lesser assurance. While an electronic signature may be a legal signature, it can still be held inadmissible if the judge feels that the signature process did not provide the appropriate level of assurance.

Electronic Signatures and Records Association, an organization which seeks to expand knowledge on both electronic signature and records, plays an active role in public policy on these topics. Check them out for additional information on the legality of electronic signatures.

In the next installment, I’ll discuss the difference between electronic signatures and digital signatures. See you then.

Opportunities and Barriers in Alternative Energy – TechPoint Event 9/4/09

22 Saturday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

The Obama administration has set ambitious goals for renewable energy and other ‘clean’ technologies – like doubling renewable energy use within three years and putting a million plug-in electric vehicles on U.S. highways by 2015 – and backed them up with significant federal funding. Venture capitalists have bought in, investing in the energy sector at record levels.

So what are the barriers that still inhibit the markets for wind power, fuel cells, coal gasification and other energy advances? How can Indiana help break down these barriers and reap the economic benefits? Register for this month’s New Economy New Rules for the answers.

techPoint-Logo

Speakers:

Noel M. Davis, Principal, JGC Industries, LLC
Greg Winkler, Director, Project Development, Brevini Wind USA, Inc
Leon Steinberg, Chief Executive Officer, National Wind LLC

Date: September 4, 2009

8:00 a.m. Registration and continental breakfast
8:30 – 9:30 a.m. Presentation

Click here to register.

Hope to see you there!

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...