Tag Archives: Tanya Walton Pratt

Indianapolis Advertising Agency sued over Song Clip in 2016 Facebook Post

28 Tuesday Nov 2023

Posted by in Advertising Law, Copyright, Indiana, Indianapolis, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Musicians, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

An Indianapolis-based advertising agency is being sued for using a 5-second song clip in a promotional video posted on their Facebook page on March 11, 2016.

The plaintiff, a musical group called the Quad City DJ’s, alleges that they first discovered the “infringing” post on June 20, 2023. Approximately 5-6 seconds of the plaintiff’s song, “Space Jam,” are played in the background of a video promoting Dribble to Work Day during the NCAA Women’s Final Four. The short promotional video, still viewable here, has only 294 views since being published in 2016. How many of those views are the plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel?

This lawsuit should serve as a warning to all businesses to go back and review old social media posts, checking for any unauthorized photos, music, videos, etc. Old social media content is now being scanned by AI bots, even “watching” old videos, and a federal lawsuit could always be lurking. While real damages might be low, copyright law allows for a plaintiff to recover statutory damages, legal costs, and attorney fees.

Consider whether it’s time for your business to delete some old social media content.

Watson Music Group, LLC v. Borshoff, Inc.

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-02117-TWP-KMB
File Date: November 22, 2023
Plaintiff: Watson Music Group, LLC d/b/a Quadrasound Music
Plaintiff Counsel: Craig Sanders, Esq. of Sanders Law Group
Defendant: Borshoff, Inc.
Cause: Direct Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Kellie M. Barr

Complaint:

Photography Copyright Lawsuit filed against Indiana Hardwood Grower

14 Tuesday Nov 2023

Posted by in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

Here’s yet another photography lawsuit where a company is alleged to have used a photograph without authorization. The defendant this time is a Deputy, Indiana grower/manufacturer of Indiana hardwood products.

All companies should immediately prioritize reviewing their website to confirm ownership, approval, or other legal authority (e.g. fair use) for EVERY photograph. Otherwise, AI image searches will eventually find the unauthorized use and a copyright lawsuit will always be just around the corner. Using Google Images to find photographs for a website is never a good idea.

Stross v. Homestead Properties, Inc.

Court Case Number: 4:23-cv-00183-TWP-KMB
File Date: November 9, 2023
Plaintiff: Alexander Bayonne Stross
Plaintiff Counsel: J. Campbell Miller of SRIPLAW, P.A.
Defendant: Homestead Properties, Inc. dba Tiny Timbers
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Removal of Copyright Management Information
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Kellie M. Barr

Complaint:

USA Football sues USA Flag for Trademark Infringement

16 Thursday Feb 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , ,

USA Football organizes football training events for players, coaches, and officials. USA Football was endowed by the National Football League and the National Football League Players Association in 2002.

USA Football has filed a lawsuit in Indiana attempting to prevent the use of the mark USA FLAG in connection with flag football tournaments and leagues. The parties to the lawsuit have a lengthy history, with Defendant Burnett first approaching USA Football in 2017 about a potential collaboration. Over the following years, the relationship involved both a Consulting Agreement and an Event Collaboration Agreement between the parties. However, per the Complaint (below), USA Football always maintained that the USA FLAG mark could not be used, previously opposing a USA FLAG trademark application.

Unable to successfully persuade/convince USA Flag to stop using an allegedly confusingly similar trademark, USA Football now seeks court intervention, including requests for injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. As USA Flag seems dug into its position, this lawsuit could get interesting. USA Flag previously chose not to defend in the trademark opposition proceeding, resulting in a notice of default. Surely USA Flag won’t attempt that same strategy in federal court. Stay tuned for updates.

USA Football, Inc. v. Flag Football World Championship Tour, LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-00274-TWP-KMB
File Date: February 13, 2023
Plaintiff: USA Football, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Amie N. Peele of Peele Law Group, PC; Louis T. Perry of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Defendants: Flag Football World Championship Tour, LLC, USA Flag, LLC, Travis Burnett
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Contributory Trademark Infringement, Vicarious Trademark Infringement, Unjust Enrichment, Conversion, Deception, Indiana Crime Victim’s Relief Act
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Kellie M. Barr

Complaint:

Fireworks involved in first Indiana Trademark Lawsuit of 2023

10 Tuesday Jan 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Happy New Year! It didn’t take long to get the first Indiana trademark (and trade dress) lawsuit of 2023, and in continuation of the festive celebrations, it involves fireworks.

The Defendants are alleged to be selling fireworks that infringe the Plaintiff’s registered TIKI, GHOST, and XL trademarks, as well as a “Tiki Trade Dress”.

The parties seem to be all major players in the fireworks industry, so they likely have some history. The Plaintiff has registered trademarks and it seems that the Defendants introduced new competing products utilizing similar marks after the registration date. As always, the Defendants’ Answer may tell another side of the story so stay tuned for updates.

1.4G Holdings, LLC v. North Central Industries, Inc. et al.

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-00037-TWP-MG
File Date: January 5, 2023
Plaintiff: 1.4G Holdings, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Philip R. Zimmerly of Bose McKinney & Evans LLP
Defendants: North Central Industries, Inc., Great Grizzly, Inc., R.Brown, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Trade Dress Infringement, Misappropriation
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Mario Garcia

Complaint:

Microsoft sues in Indiana over Phony Tech Support Schemes

28 Monday Feb 2022

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Nearly seven out of ten Americans have encountered a technical support scam in the previous twelve months. Approximately ten percent of those respondents lost money from such scams. That’s not cool.

Microsoft is attempting to crack down on phony Microsoft support scams, in this particular instance focusing on a New Jersey individual operating a shell Indiana company called “Think Global.” The Complaint (below) details the scam and an interaction between Microsoft’s agent (presumably an attorney or technical investigator) and the alleged scammer(s).

The Complaint names an individual, a Mount Laurel, New Jersey resident (the sole member of the Indiana company), so perhaps there will be some justice for all the scammed individuals.

Stay tuned for updates.

Microsoft Corporation v. Solution Hat, LLC d/b/a Think Global et al.

Case Number: 1:22-cv-00396-TWP-TAB
File Date: February 25, 2022
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Jeff M. Barron of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Bonnie MacNaughton, Meagan Himes of David Wright Tremaine LLP
Defendant: Solution Hat, LLC d/b/a/ Think Global et al,
Cause: Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, Telemarketing Sales Rule, Trademark Infringement, False Advertising, False Designation of Origin, Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Cybersquatting
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referred To: Tim A. Baker

Complaint: