• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Southern District of Indiana

Ethics of E-Discovery – Free Webinar

08 Tuesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Debra Bernard, Electric Discovery Pilot Program, Ethics of Discovery, Mark J. Dinsmore, Rachel Lei, Southern District of Indiana, Timothy Chorvat, Wilson Elser

The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program is sponsoring the following free webinar:

Ethics of E-Discovery

November 30, 2011 – Noon – 1:30 p.m. (CST)

The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program, together with Wilson Elser, has developed a webinar designed to assist you in identifying the various ethical issues that arise in executing your e-discovery responsibilities and to provide you with a basic framework to help you navigate through the e-discovery ethical pitfalls that may arise.

Some of the questions that will be discussed include:

– What are your ethical duties regarding preservation of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) and what triggers those duties? Does it matter if you are only outside counsel?

– What ethical considerations are at play when you are searching for and producing ESI? What if you know proposed search terms will yield no results? Must you speak up?

– To what extent does metadata pose ethical issues?

– What if you inadvertently produce privileged information? Do you need a clawback or will the rules protect you?

– What about contract attorneys? What is the scope your ethical obligation to supervise?

This program will provide you with various perspectives to these questions from plaintiffs counsel, defense counsel, in-house counsel and the judges.

The webinar moderator will be Cinthia Motley of Wilson Elser. Speakers will be the Honorable Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, as well as other Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program Committee Members Debra Bernard of Perkins Coie, Timothy Chorvat of Jenner & Block, and Rachel Lei of GATX Corporation.

CLICK HERE to register for this November 30, 2011 event, which is open to all judges and attorneys.

Registration to this webinar is limited to 3000 participants, so sign up early.

Applications for 1.5 Ethics MCLE credits have been submitted and are pending approval in Indiana (and Illinois and Wisconsin).

Indiana Scientist Pleads Guilty to Stealing Trade Secrets for China

19 Wednesday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Secret

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cargill Inc., Dow Chemical Co., Intellectual Property, Kexue Huang, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Southern District of Indiana, U.S. Economic Espionage Act of 1996

Indiana companies can take an extra dose of comfort today knowing the Indiana courts and prosecutors are protecting their valuable intellectual property. A Chinese-born scientist pleaded guilty on Tuesday to stealing valuable trade secrets about pesticides and food products from two major U.S. companies and sending the information to China and Germany.

Kexue Huang, 46, worked at a Dow Chemical Co subsidiary from 2003 to 2008 in Indiana where he led a team of scientists developing organic insecticides and then later for another agribusiness giant, privately held Cargill Inc.

Huang pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana to one count of stealing trade secrets from Cargill and one count of engaging in economic espionage at Dow, only the eighth case charged involving the U.S. Economic Espionage Act of 1996.

Click here for the full Reuters story or the original indictment over a year ago.

For more information on protecting your valuable trade secrets: Creating a Trade Secret Policy

Amendments to Southern District of Indiana Local Rules – Effective January 1

27 Monday Dec 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Intellectual Property, Southern District of Indiana

Intellectual Property practitioners in Indiana should note that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has published Amendments to their Local Rules, effective January 1, 2011.

The pertinent Amendments involve Class Action designations (Local Rule 23.1) and Discovery Disputes (Local Rules 37.1 and 37.3).

View this document on Scribd
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...