• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Jane Magnus-Stinson

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (671)

25 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Mark J. Dinsmore, Paul J. Nicoletti

Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00671-JMS-MJD
File Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (670)

25 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Mark J. Dinsmore, Paul J. Nicoletti

Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00670-JMS-MJD
File Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (668)

25 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Mark J. Dinsmore, Paul J. Nicoletti

Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00668-JMS-MJD
File Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore

View this document on Scribd

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe (664)

25 Thursday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Mark J. Dinsmore, Paul J. Nicoletti

Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00664-JMS-MJD
File Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore

View this document on Scribd

Indiana man ordered to pay over $150,000 in download case

09 Tuesday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BitTorrent, CP Productions v. John Doe, Jane Magnus-Stinson

The first of the Indiana download cases has proceeded to a Final Judgment and the damage amount awarded by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson won’t please the hundreds of other Indiana defendants still facing a default judgment. After he failed to present a defense to the illegal download of “Maryjane’s Second Visit”, a Default Judgment was entered against the Defendant. The damage award, which includes the maximum allowable copyright damages, tallied in at $151,425. No matter your view on pornography or copyright infringement, that’s a pretty steep fine for the digital equivalent of sneaking in the back door of a nudie show.

What do you think of the judgment? Did the Judge apply discretion in awarding the maximum amount? Either way, Judge Magnus-Stinson has now provided the other Indiana download defendants with an upper limit on how much they should spend on a defense.

View this document on Scribd

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar