Tag Archives: Federal Trademark Infringement

Trademark Infringement Lawsuit filed in Indiana over Surgical Bovine Collagen, Implant Kits

02 Thursday Nov 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

The plaintiff in this new Indiana trademark infringement lawsuit, Ventris Medical, offers a bovine collagen product for management of complex wounds called CONNEXT®.

The defendant, Nexxt Spine of Noblesville, Indiana, recently adopted and is using the mark CONNEXX in connection with a surgical implant kit.

Per the Complaint (below), cease-and-desist communications have been unsuccessful to date and the plaintiff now seeks court intervention in the Southern District of Indiana.

In this case, both parties sell products to highly sophisticated consumers, i.e. surgeons. The more sophisticated the purchaser, the less likely that there will be likelihood of confusion. The defendant likely considered that high sophistication level when selecting its similar trademark.

Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC v. Nexxt Spine, LLC

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-01960-JRS-MKK
File Date: November 1, 2023
Plaintiff: Secada Medical LLC d/b/a Ventris Medical, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Samuel B. Gardner of Ice Miller LLP
Defendant: Nexxt Spine, LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Passing Off
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: James R. Sweeney II
Referred To: M. Kendra Klump

Complaint:

Indiana Lawn Care Manufacturer sues eBay Counterfeiter in Northern District of Indiana

09 Monday Oct 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Perma-Green, based in Valparaiso, Indiana, has manufactured and sold commercial lawn care products since 1973. They own an incontestable registration for the trademark PERMAGREEN for “mechanical spreaders and sprayers for the lawn care industry” with a claimed date of first use of February 1, 2005.

“Dr. Permagreen” is an eBay Seller account that lists over 1,400 Perma-Green products, including replacement parts. However, the parts being sold by the eBay account are allegedly low-quality counterfeit copies created in China, not authentic Perma-Green products.

Perma-Green alleges consumer confusion has been caused by the eBay account’s use of a similar name and deceptive product titles, with consumers falsely believing that the eBay account is associated with Perma-Green and that the products originate from Perma-Green. Consumer complaints over defective products were incorrectly directed towards Perma-Green, presumably damaging the goodwill in their brand.

Faulty or defective parts can obviously be a big problem when it comes to lawn care equipment by creating an increased risk of serious injury. After unsuccessful cease-and-desist communications, Perma-Green has brought a lawsuit (see Complaint below) seeking court intervention in an attempt to halt the damage currently being done to its brand. The Complaint alleges willful infringement based on email communications from the alleged operator of the eBay account.

Stay tuned for updates.

Perma-Green Supreme, Inc. v. Dr. Permagreen, LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 2:23-cv-00341
File Date: October 6, 2023
Plaintiff: Perma-Green Supreme, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: P.Stephen Fardy, William D. Patterson of Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP
Defendant: Dr. Permagreen, LLC, Michael Edward Klott, FTW Investments LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal False Advertising, Deceptive Consumer Sales, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Philip P. Simon
Referred To: John E. Martin

Complaint:

Two Indiana Valve Companies involved in Trade Dress Lawsuit over Yellow Valve Handles

02 Monday Oct 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Banjo Corporation of Crawfordsville, Indiana, designs, manufactures, distributes, and sells control valves for regulating the flow of liquids in hoses and pipes. Since 1994, Banjo’s valves have had distinctive yellow-colored handles. Banjo currently sells approximately 150 types of control valves, all bearing the distinctive yellow handles.

Green Leaf of Fontanet, Indiana, has been selling control valves with green handles since 1983. In 2019, after hiring 2 ex-Banjo employees, Green Leaf launched a line of yellow-handled valves. Green Leaf’s new valve line uses the name TERREMAX.

In a lawsuit filed in the Southern District of Indiana, Banjo accuses Green Leaf of violating its trade dress in the yellow valve handles. The name TERREMAX is also allegedly meant to imitate Banjo’s line of TERRE and TERRE KNIFE products. The Complaint (below) details other alleged deceptive conduct by Green Leaf, but we’ll be most interested in watching the trade dress claim for the yellow handle design.

Stay tuned for updates.

Banjo Corporation v. Green Leaf, Inc.

Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-01770-SEB-MG
File Date: September 29, 2023
Plaintiff: Banjo Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Dwight D. Lueck of Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, Jonathan E. Moskin of Foley & Lardner LLP
Defendant: Green Leaf, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Trade Dress Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal False Designations of Origin, Federal False Advertising, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referred To: Mario Garcia

Complaint:

LaPorte Video Game Arcade sued for Trademark Infringement

27 Thursday Jul 2023

Posted by in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Full Tilt Arcade & Pinball is a video game arcade in LaPorte, Indiana. It was opened by two friends in October 2022.

Unfortunately for Full Tilt, Nickels and Dimes Incorporated of Celina, Texas, has been using the TILT trademark in connection with video game arcades since 1977. There have been over 200 “Tilt” locations nationwide and 2 in Australia. Nickels and Dimes also uses the TILT STUDIO and TILTED 10 trademarks for larger entertainment facilities.

Alleging trademark infringement, Nickels and Dimes sent a cease-and-desist letter to Full Tilt on June 22, 2023, to which Full Tilt responded that it would not comply. Undaunted, Nickels and Dimes now seeks intervention from the Federal Court for the Northern District of Indiana.

Stay tuned for updates.

Nickels and Dimes Incorporated v. Noah’s Arcade, LLC d/b/a Full Tilt et al.

Court Case Number: 3:23-cv-00699-DRL-MGG
File Date: July 25, 2023
Plaintiff: Nickel and Dimes Incorporated
Plaintiff Counsel: Jonathan G. Polak of Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP
Defendant: Noah’s Arcade, LLC d/b/a Full Tilt, Ben Konowitz, Ryan Hart
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge:  Damon R. Leichty
Referred To: Michael G. Gotsch, Sr.

Complaint:

Ivy Tech sued for $2 million over use of BLACK COLLEGE EXPO trademark

17 Wednesday May 2023

Posted by in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Nonprofit, Northern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

The National College Resources Foundation (“NCRF”) is a California-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit and purported owner of the registered BLACK COLLEGE EXPO trademark.

Ivy Tech Community College (“Ivy Tech”), a two-year community college serving over 75 Indiana communities, allegedly used the phrase “Black College Expo” to describe an enrollment event held on its South Bend campus in January 2023. NCRF’s counsel sent a cease-and-desist in December 2022 and Ivy Tech promptly agreed to stop using the phrase but did not do so, apparently using it again in a January 9 Instagram post.

Apparently not satisfied with Ivy Tech’s response (notably during a holiday period when many college employees would not be working or even checking email), NCRF now brings a federal trademark lawsuit against Ivy Tech seeking $2,000,000 as well as punitive damages.

The BLACK COLLEGE EXPO registration is actually owned by a California individual named Theresa Price, apparently the founder and CEO of the National College Resources Foundation. The unsigned Complaint (see below) does not reference any license between Mrs. Price and the organization but presumably that does exist. The registration also includes a disclaimer of the descriptive term “EXPO.”

Should this lawsuit go far enough, I’d expect Ivy Tech and the other defendants to assert that they were not using “BLACK COLLEGE EXPO” as a source-identifying trademark and rather simply as a non-source-identifying descriptive term. However, it’s more likely that the community college (via instructions from its insurance provider) will back down and pay some nominal settlement amount to quickly resolve the lawsuit. The Complaint also includes as defendants two organizations connected to the Ivy Tech event, Mentoring Moments and The Strong Friend. I’m guessing both of those organizations have better ways to spend their funds than fighting a federal lawsuit.

Stay tuned for updates.

National College Resources Foundation v. The Strong Friends LLC et al.

Court Case Number: 3:23-cv-00367-JD-MGG
File Date: May 4, 2023
Plaintiff: National College Resources Foundation
Plaintiff Counsel: Justin A. Smith, Esq. of National College Resources Foundation
Defendant: The Strong Friends LLC, Mentoring Moments, LLC, Ivy Tech Community College
Cause: Federal Trademark Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, False Descriptions and Representations, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Northern District of Indiana
Judge: Jon E. DeGuilio
Referred To: Michael G. Gotsch, Sr.

Complaint: