• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Litigation

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

13 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Entertainment Law, Litigation, Musicians, Nonprofit, Privacy, Social Media, Stories from the Week that Was, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Facebook, Spotify

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

Don’t Believe Facebook, Spotify’s The Only Open Graph Music App Winning

Two-thirds support social networking blackout in future riots

Facebook nears settlement with FTC on privacy

Social Media Impact by Nonprofit Issues [Infographic]

Six-year project to tweet the Second World War

“If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger.” – Frank Lloyd Wright

Ethics of E-Discovery – Free Webinar

08 Tuesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Southern District of Indiana

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Debra Bernard, Electric Discovery Pilot Program, Ethics of Discovery, Mark J. Dinsmore, Rachel Lei, Southern District of Indiana, Timothy Chorvat, Wilson Elser

The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program is sponsoring the following free webinar:

Ethics of E-Discovery

November 30, 2011 – Noon – 1:30 p.m. (CST)

The Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program, together with Wilson Elser, has developed a webinar designed to assist you in identifying the various ethical issues that arise in executing your e-discovery responsibilities and to provide you with a basic framework to help you navigate through the e-discovery ethical pitfalls that may arise.

Some of the questions that will be discussed include:

– What are your ethical duties regarding preservation of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) and what triggers those duties? Does it matter if you are only outside counsel?

– What ethical considerations are at play when you are searching for and producing ESI? What if you know proposed search terms will yield no results? Must you speak up?

– To what extent does metadata pose ethical issues?

– What if you inadvertently produce privileged information? Do you need a clawback or will the rules protect you?

– What about contract attorneys? What is the scope your ethical obligation to supervise?

This program will provide you with various perspectives to these questions from plaintiffs counsel, defense counsel, in-house counsel and the judges.

The webinar moderator will be Cinthia Motley of Wilson Elser. Speakers will be the Honorable Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, as well as other Seventh Circuit Electronic Discovery Pilot Program Committee Members Debra Bernard of Perkins Coie, Timothy Chorvat of Jenner & Block, and Rachel Lei of GATX Corporation.

CLICK HERE to register for this November 30, 2011 event, which is open to all judges and attorneys.

Registration to this webinar is limited to 3000 participants, so sign up early.

Applications for 1.5 Ethics MCLE credits have been submitted and are pending approval in Indiana (and Illinois and Wisconsin).

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

06 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Bloggers, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media, Stories from the Week that Was, Tech Developments, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BitTorrent, Occupy Wall Street

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

Protecting Your Online Reputation: 4 Things You Need to Know

Major Book Publisher Files Mass-BitTorrent Lawsuit

Occupy Wall Street applies for trademark

Just how big is 7 billion?

People Who Use Macs At Work Are Richer And More Productive


– WIPO IP Facts and Figures 2011

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Eli Lilly v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic

05 Saturday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Tim A. Baker, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Eli Lilly and Company v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd. et al

Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-01469-JMS-TAB
File Date: Friday, November 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Jan M. Carroll of Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant: Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd.
Petvetshop Pty Ltd.
Paul Sorensen
Dr. Cymantha Sorensen
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

View this document on Scribd

Indiana AG Greg Zoeller to Lobby Congress Against Cellphone Bill

03 Thursday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Federal Initiatives, Indiana, Legislation, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Do Not Call, Greg Zoeller

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said he will lobby Congress on Friday against a federal bill he says would strip the telephone privacy rights of residents in Indiana. Zoeller plans to testify before the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications and Technology against House Resolution 3035, a primarily Republican-backed bill being considered in the U.S. House. The bill would allow telemarketers and debt collectors to start dialing residents’ cellphones and, if approved, would override Indiana’s “Do Not Call” law and lead to a flood of robocalls to people’s phones, Zoeller said Wednesday.

Supporters of the bill say it would update federal law to allow businesses to compete in an environment where cellphones have largely replaced landlines.

Zoeller is fighting on multiple legal fronts to maintain Indiana’s strong “Do Not Call” law and ban on political robocalls.

The Southern District of Indiana ruled in September that Indiana’s ban on political robocalls violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protections Act which governs interstate communications. The Indiana Supreme Court is separately considering whether the state rightfully enforced the measure against FreeEats.com.

For more info, see the Journal and Courier.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...