• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Indiana

Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI offers new Sustainable Technologies Certificate

15 Tuesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Purdue, Sustainable Technologies Certificate

The Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI recently announced a new “Sustainable Technologies Certificate” available to help students prepare for the changing green job market. This certificate is designed to address a growing need for professionals who can contribute to the green workforce with knowledge in sustainable practices in current technologies. The Sustainable Technologies Certificate is useful to students who want to have knowledge in areas of green building, renewable energies and sustainable design.

Here’s a link to the school’s other certificate programs.

Source: Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI

Indiana University Dedicates New Cyberinfrastructure Building

10 Thursday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Privacy, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Michael McRobbie

Indiana University is home to a new $37 million cyberinfrastructure facility that could prove vitally important to our future national security.

According to Indiana University President Michael A. McRobbie, “Cyberinfrastructure is the complex integration using high speed networks of geographically distributed services, supercomputers, massive data storage devices and a diverse array of research devices from high-powered microscopes to DNA sequencing arrays to radio and optical telescopes. And on top of all of this is an extensive set of research, educational and administrative applications and services.”

The new facility is adjacent to two other recent IT investments at IU, the $32.7 million IU Data Center that houses more than 1,000 computer servers, and the $10 million IU Innovation Center, which is home to university researchers, start-up companies and IU’s Pervasive Technology Institute. It features a collaborative, open-space office design, numerous spaces for teleconferencing, three telepresence rooms, 36 “focus booths” for meetings and private discussions, and abundant soft- and bar-style seating to encourage work throughout the building. The CIB design also represents a significant investment in green infrastructure with its employee bicycle garage, locker rooms with showers and storage, solar panels and grounds landscaped for water capture.

Source: IU News Room

Indianapolis Company Wins Award to Develop Enhanced Blind and Low Vision Technology for Students

09 Wednesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Federal Initiatives, Indiana, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

HumanWare, Independence Science, National Science Foundation, Purdue, Vernier, ViewPlus

Independence Science LLC, an Indianapolis company based in the Purdue Research Park, has received a $500,000 SBIR Phase II award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop technology that enhances hands-on science learning for students affected by blindness and low vision.

Independence Science will use the award to further develop Talking LabQuest, the first portable scientific data collection device equipped with text-to-speech technology to help students in science laboratory classrooms.

The company is developing Talking LabQuest in partnership with Vernier Software & Technology LLC of Beaverton, Ore.; HumanWare Inc. of Drummondville, Quebec, Canada; and ViewPlus Technologies Inc. of Corvallis, Ore.

For more, see Inside INdiana Business.

Trademark Licensing Lessons from the Faucet Couture

09 Wednesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Branding, Fashion, Indiana, Indianapolis, Intellectual Property, Tech Developments, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Brizo, Jason Wu, Licensing

It looks like a unique cross-licensing venture may force me to revise my standard email that I send to trademark clients. For years, I’ve used the following language to help clients understand how to properly select goods and services for their trademark application:

An applicant must state the specific goods or services for which registration is sought and with which the applicant has actually used the mark in commerce. You will not be able to claim federal trademark protection for goods and services outside of those listed in your application (for example, a plumbing company could begin selling “INSERT CLIENT TRADEMARK” faucets without infringing upon your registration as it will not claim “faucets.”

Introducing Jason Wu for Brizo. It turns out a trademark’s expansion into the faucet market may not be so unlikely after all:

Jason Wu is a popular Manhattan-based fashion designer. Brizo is an Indianapolis-based provider of luxury faucets. The two have collaborated to create faucets that, besides looking good, also have a green tech aspect that is pretty cool:

The Jason Wu for Brizo Odin faucet is equipped with SmartTouchPlus(TM) Technology, which allows users to start and stop the flow of water with a simple touch anywhere on the spout or handle of the faucet. For a more intuitive experience, its hands-free mode activates the flow of water when hands are anywhere within 4″ of the faucet…an exclusive temperature control technology featuring a new temperature sensing indicator. A LED light display built into the base of the faucet uses shades of light, from blue to magenta to red, to indicate actual water temperature. The electronic valve built into the lavatory faucet also monitors the mixture of hot and cold water to help provide a consistent temperature for the user, while its high temperature limit stop offers an added degree of safety.

This teamup is a nice reminder that collaborative trademark cross-licensing can be a win-win for all parties. If successful, the Jason Wu for Brizo collection will reinforce the position of the Brizo faucet brand as fashion forward and innovative, and it marks the debut of the popular Jason Wu into the world of interior design.

Have Jason Wu and Brizo got you thinking about finding a trademark license for your company? Although the terms of every trademark license are different and may be freely negotiated between the licensor and licensee, all licenses must at least include the following provisions to be valid:

  • The legal names of the licensor and licensee
  • Identification of the trademark(s) that are the subject of the licensing agreement
  • Identification of the products/services with which the licensed mark may be used
  • The geographic territory in which the licensee may operate and sell its products/services
  • Quality control provisions that set forth clear standards as to the nature and quality of the licensed products/services

Optimally, a trademark license should also explicitly state:

  • whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive
  • the duration of the license
  • whether the license may be renewed and under what conditions
  • the amount of any royalty payments or other compensation due to the licensor and when those payments are to be made
  • the responsibilities of both parties upon the termination or expiration of the license
  • the consequences of breaching the license and the time in which the breach must be remedied

Can you think of other innovative trademark cross-licensing efforts from Indiana companies? Leave a comment below.

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Eli Lilly v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic

05 Saturday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Indiana, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Southern District of Indiana, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Jane Magnus-Stinson, Litigation Update, Tim A. Baker, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Eli Lilly and Company v. Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd. et al

Court Case Number: 1:11-cv-01469-JMS-TAB
File Date: Friday, November 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Eli Lilly and Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Jan M. Carroll of Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant: Yanchep Veterinary Clinic Pty Ltd.
Petvetshop Pty Ltd.
Paul Sorensen
Dr. Cymantha Sorensen
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Cybersquatting, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: Southern District of Indiana
Judge: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...