• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Copyright

Northwest Indiana SBDC hosting Intellectual Property Workshops

21 Thursday Jan 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Indiana, Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

The Hammond INnovation Center, 5209 Hohman Ave., is hosting a new workshop series for small business owners. The Smart Start Workshop is an early morning workshop, held in partnership with the Northwest Indiana Small Business Development Center, that helps entrepreneurs get a head start on their business.

The workshops will begin with the two-part series, “Jump-Start Your Business with Intellectual Property,” presented by Cook Alex Intellectual Property Law.

Thursday, January 21 – Copyright and Trademark for Small Business: Learn about how these aspects of intellectual property law apply to your business, what is and is not covered both locally and internationally and the best ways to protect your intellectual property.

Feb: 18 – Patents for Beginners: This dedicated workshop will cover what you need to file a patent, when to move on a patent, how patents protect your invention and where to get help.

Cost is $20 per session. The workshops start at 7:30 a.m. and a breakfast will be included. Reservations and payment are required by 3 p.m. the previous day. To reserve a spot, call (219) 750-1200 or e-mail innovate@calumet.purdue.edu. Reservations can also be made online by visiting www.nwisbdc.org, clicking on calendars, workshop, the event and following the link.

What Could Have Been Entering the Public Domain on January 1, 2010?

04 Monday Jan 2010

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Copyright, Federal Initiatives, Legislation

≈ Leave a comment

Current US law extends copyright protections for 70 years from the date of the author’s death. (Corporate “works-for-hire” are copyrighted for 95 years.) But prior to the 1976 Copyright Act (which became effective in 1978), the maximum copyright term was 56 years (an initial term of 28 years, renewable for another 28 years).  Under those laws, works published in 1953 would be passing into the public domain on January 1, 2010.

This includes:

  • Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451
  • C.S. Lewis’s The Silver Chair (the fourth book in The Chronicles of Narnia)
  • Walt Disney’s Peter Pan
  • H.G. Well’s The War of the Worlds
  • From Here to Eternity (starring Burt Lancaster, Montgomery Clift, Deborah Kerr, Frank Sinatra, and Donna Reed)

Click here for a full discussion and additional works.

Source: Center for the Study of the Public Domain

A Legal Primer for Bloggers – Intellectual Property

11 Friday Sep 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Authors, Bloggers, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Social Media, Tech Developments, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

A Legal Primer for Bloggers, Part 2 – Intellectual Property

This post continues a series dealing specifically with the legal issues that bloggers should be thinking about.  Part 2 will help you understand your rights to link to information or graphics from other sources, quote from articles and blogs, or otherwise use someone else’s copyrighted works.  It will also discuss the appropriate use of trademarks in blogs (both your marks and those of others).

I. Overview of Intellectual Property

What is copyright?

Copyright gives a creative person control over the use of an original work of authorship.  A copyright owner has the exclusive right to reproduce a work, prepare derivative works, distribute copies or perform a work publicly.  In the world of bloggers, original works of authorship can include text, images, audio or video creations (and a whole host of other things).

What is trademark?

A trademark is a distinctive sign or indicator used to identify that the products or services with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities.

So think:

Pepsi®, McDonalds®, Apple®

Or:

pepsi logo mcdonalds apple logo

When you either hear/read the word mark or see the logo mark, you immediately associate that trademark with a particular product or service.  Obviously, these are examples of very strong trademarks.

II.  Copyright

Copyright issues start to come into play when you publish material created by others on your blog or, conversely, when someone else republishes material that you posted on your blog or website.

Copyright law applies to the reposting of text, images, audio and video.  If you’re posting somebody else’s original work, you’re likely violating one of the exclusive rights mentioned above. But as you, me and anyone else on the Internet knows, people are copy/pasting, hyperlinking and cross-referencing all over the world, all the time.  Are they all liable for copyright infringement? Luckily, the Copyright Act has a built-in exception called “fair use” that allows you to use other people’s copyrighted works for certain, enumerated purposes.  These include criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research.  So, for example, if you are commenting on or criticizing an item that someone else has posted, and use a quote from that source, that’s probably fair use.

The following factors are considered in a fair use analysis:

  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Keep in mind that the law favors “transformative” use.  In other words, if you’re reposting another person’s original work, it’s more likely to be fair use if you’re using that work in a different manner or for a different purpose than the original.  While you may borrow directly from another source, adding your own commentary and content is better than strict copying.  Likewise, it’s better to repost only a small portion of someone else’s work than the work in its entirety.

If you feel that you’ve gone too far in your copying, you probably have.  Consider whether you’re able to share the same information but in a different way (i.e. your own words).  If you can’t, that’s strong evidence it’s a fair use.  Don’t worry if you’re confused…this is a gray area in copyright law that isn’t totally clear to anyone at the moment.  If you have specific questions about your use of someone else’s creative works or someone else is using your works, contact a copyright professional (who should be well-versed on legal developments and what typically constitutes fair use) to provide a more detailed analysis.

Also, on a practical note, if you’re using someone else’s text or images and they contact you to ask you to remove them, you probably just want to go ahead and do it.  After all, there are lots of different ways to express an idea and usually hundreds of equally wonderful pictures to adorn your blog.  On the other side, if you find someone else using your text or images, take a deep breath before contacting them and remember what Barney says about sharing:

III. Trademark

Let’s talk first about your own trademarks.  Often you’ll have spent good time and money developing and protecting your trademarks.  It would be a shame to lose your rights through improper use.  Proper use enhances a mark’s ability to identify the origin of products or services, and minimizes the likelihood that a mark will become generic, or be abandoned unintentionally.  Make sure you always use a proper trademark notice (™ for common law rights, ® if you’ve obtained registration) and remember to use your trademark as an adjective. Escalator was once a registered trademark but rights were lost when everyone started using the term as a noun to describe just any ol’ moving stairway.  The mark no longer brought to mind its owner as the single origin of the product.

It’s probably just as common that you’ll post someone else’s trademark…I know this blog, as a news and information source, posts 3rd-party trademarks fairly regularly.  This is typically permissible, because while trademark law prevents you from using someone else’s trademark to sell your competing products, it doesn’t stop you from using the trademark to refer to the trademark owner or its products. That is called “nominative fair use,” and is permitted if using the trademark is necessary to identify the products, services, or company you’re talking about, and you don’t use the mark to suggest the company endorses you.  Again, bloggers get by on an exception to the rule…we are living in a gray legal realm.  Consult a trademark professional if you’re concerned about your use of somebody else’s trademark.

trademarknotice

The next post in the series will be A Legal Primer for Bloggers: Defamation.  The post will explore your options when somebody has posted something false and damaging about you, including some common defenses.  Until next time, sticks and stones, my friends!

A Legal Primer for Bloggers

Part 1: Introduction

Part 2: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Part 3: Defamation

Part 4: Anonymity

Part 5: Privacy

How to Negotiate Your Next Book Contract – A Workshop for Authors 8/25/09

03 Monday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, KLF Legal

≈ Leave a comment

The blog’s author, Kenan L. Farrell, will be leading an upcoming workshop on negotiating author’s contracts.  Understand what you’re signing when dealing with your publisher.  Learn the art and craft of contract negotiation and analysis.  Authors and publishers alike are welcome to join the workshop.

contract2

In addition, financial advisor Adam Cmejla will be giving a complimentary informative presentation entitled “Where Is the American Economy Today,” which will address and talk about the issues authors have faced and are facing as we move forward through these turbulent economic times.

Complimentary food and beverages will be available.

Date:    Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Time:    6:00pm – 8:00pm
Cost:  Free, but please RSVP
Location:    DoubleTree Inn & Suites
Street:    11355 North Meridian Street
City/Town:    Carmel, IN

View Larger Map

Please RSVP on the Facebook Event Page or via email to adam.cmejla@gmail.com.

Indiana Copyright Litigation Update – Supreme Court Decision

29 Friday May 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Litigation, Supreme Court

≈ Leave a comment

Copyright Litigation Decision – Supreme Court of Indiana

justices2

Conwell v. Grey Loon Outdoor Marketing Group, Inc.
No: 82S04-0806-CV-00309 (May 19, 2009)
Supreme Court of Indiana
Before: Sullivan, Dickson, Shepard, Rucker, and Boehm

Click here for full opinion.

COPYRIGHT; OWNERSHIP (A contractor who created copyrighted material for a principal was the owner because the work for hire doctrine applies only to employees, and the contractor never transferred the copyright.)

Opinion (Shepard): Plaintiff Piece of America (POA) contracted Grey Loon Outdoor Marketing Group (Grey Loon) to build a website. Grey Loon subsequently finished the website, and hosted it as well.  Eventually, POA failed to pay for ongoing hosting and work, and Grey Loon removed the website without making backup copies.  POA sued Grey Loon for conversion of the website.  Conversion requires ownership of the object converted.  If an employee creates copyrighted material in the scope of employment, the material belongs to the employee.  However, Grey Loon was an independent contractor, and therefore was the owner of the website.  Grey Loon also never transferred ownership of the website to POA. The court held that Grey Loon had merely granted an implied nonexclusive license to POA and therefore, Grey Loon was the owner of the copyright for the website.  Affirmed.

Source:  Willamette Law Online

People, be sure you clarify ownership of your website in your Website Design and Hosting Agreement.  More often than not, the copyright will remain with your designer unless you negotiate for it, which could raise the designer’s fees.

For a complete analysis of the facts of the case, check out Exclusive Rights, a copyright law blog.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...