• Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

~ Trademark and Copyright Law Updates in Indiana

Indiana Intellectual Property Blog

Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Indiana Teenager Investigated by FBI Over World of Warcraft Comments

14 Tuesday Jul 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Just for Fun, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

Big Brother has come to Azeroth.  An Indiana resident has been contacted by authorities over comments made in the popular online game World of Warcraft.  The 18-year-old typed multiple “threats” that he “was going to board a plane at 7:30 to Chicago and that (he) as going to try and kill as many Americans as possible.”  The Indy Star reports:

A Johnson County man who told investigators that he was merely testing a theory could face federal charges after he told deputies he threatened to blow up a commercial airliner.

The 18-year-old, who lives in the 4000 block of Ridgemere Drive, Greenwood, told Johnson County deputies that he was playing a popular online role-playing game early Monday morning when he issued a threat that he “was going to board a plane at 7:30 to Chicago and that (he) was going to try and kill as many Americans as possible,” according to an incident report from the sheriff’s department.

A facilitator with an online gaming center alerted authorities after she noticed several messages from the man, who was playing “World of Warcraft,” threatening to blow up an airliner.

The man, who originally told investigators that someone had hacked into his computer, admitted he jokingly made the threats, which did not name a specific airline, because he had heard that merely doing so would bring police to his house, “but I didn’t really believe it,” he said in a written statement.

A representative from Blizzard Entertainment, the online gaming site, would not disclose the exact content of the chat logs to investigators without a subpoena, but she said the logs seemed “very serious” and did not seem like jokes.

The man’s computer was seized as evidence.

The Federal Bureau of Investigations, which took over the investigation, could file charges with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, according to the affidavit.

flyingmount1Some might suggest that this is further evidence of America’s hypersensitivity to security issues.  It’s telling that we’re now at the point where the FBI investigates teenagers who post inflammatory comments in online games.  Admittedly, it’s not always easy to know where to draw the line between security and civil rights.  Quite frankly, I’ve seen people say much worse (and more realistic) comments in online games.  Under a different gaming center facilitator, this kid would merely been dismissed as a troll.  I’d imagine the FBI can pretty quickly determine whether this individual had undergone any real planning towards carrying out the “threats” (i.e. plane tickets, weapons, etc.). But should the FBI really be involved in this at all?  Couldn’t local law enforcement sufficiently handle this investigation?

Regardless of the outcome of this particular matter, here’s the bottom line…be careful what you say online because people ARE listening.

Source: Indystar.com

Indiana Trademark Litigation Update – Franklin College v. Franklin University

07 Tuesday Jul 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Trademark

≈ 1 Comment

NEW Indiana trademark litigation alert:

Franklin College has filed a federal complaint against Franklin University, an Ohio-based institution, for trademark infringement and unfair competitive practices.  Franklin College, located 25 miles south of Indianapolis, is a liberal arts institution with about 1,000 undergraduate students.  It celebrates its 175th anniversary this year.  Franklin University, based in Columbus, Ohio, is opening a new location in the Castleton area.

FranklinComplaint

Franklin College President Jay Moseley says the decision to take action was made after Franklin University began an aggressive advertising campaign in central Indiana to promote classes being offered this fall.  He says the complaint is an effort to protect Franklin College trademarks while shielding alumni and students from confusion.

“Since Franklin University began its advertising blitz in Central Indiana this spring, we have received calls, comments and e-mail messages from many people asking why we changed our name or whether we’ve opened a satellite office for online education in Indianapolis,” Moseley said in a statement.

“We have great concerns about the impact of the obvious confusion, especially with prospective students and employers of our alumni.”

Of particular concern to Franklin College is its trademark clock tower logo.  “Their ads include colors and a ‘clock tower’ design amazingly similar to our logo,” Moseley said.

FranklinCFranklinU

Moseley also noted that the Ohio school has recently begun referring to itself as “Franklin University – Indianapolis” or simply “Franklin” in local and Internet advertising.

Franklin University has responded with the following statement:

Franklin University is and has been publicizing its presence in Indianapolis using its own name in a completely factual and consistent manner, and in close cooperation with the State of Indiana and the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. It is unfortunate that Franklin College did not contact us if it had concerns about our marketing, since we did advise the President of Franklin College of our intentions prior to beginning to offer programs in Indianapolis in 2009.

Franklin University offers academic programs that are distinct from and targeted to a very different student demographic than Franklin College. Programs are intended for the working individual, not the traditional-age on-campus college student. The University focuses on business and professional education, such as majors in accounting and business administration, not on a traditional liberal arts education.

Founded in 1902, Franklin University has been serving adult students for more than 100 years. It is the leading and most experienced educator of adult students and is nationally recognized for its student-centered approach. Franklin University, a non-profit institution of higher education provides flexible, online as well as face-to-face class scheduling, maximizes transfer of previously earned college credits, and offers tuition rates far below the national average. Franklin University has been serving adult students in Indiana through its online offerings and Community College Alliance program for nearly a decade.

Now that Franklin College has chosen to use the legal system to resolve this matter, rather than contacting Franklin University, Franklin University will certainly act to protect the right to use its own name to publicize its programs in a factual and consistent manner.

For more information about Franklin University, please visit http://www.franklin.edu.

Love the response.  Never miss an opportunity to get the word out about your course offerings and target student body.

Each parties’ respective word mark abstract:

FranklinCollege

Picture 3

Of course, the Indiana Intellectual Property & Technology Law Blog will keep you updated as this matter proceeds.  No prediction on the outcome here, since I happen to know some of the attorneys involved.  But it should be interesting…

Court Case Number: 1:09-cv-00830-WTL-TAB
File Date: Monday, July 6, 2009
Plaintiff: Franklin College of Indiana
Plaintiff Counsel: Wayne C. Turner, Michael R. Limrick of Bingham McHale LLP
Defendant: Franklin University, Inc.
Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Judge: Judge William T. Lawrence
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker

The complaint includes the following causes of action: (1) Federal Trademark Infringement; (2) False Designation of Origin and Unfair Competition; (3) Indiana State Trademark Infringement; (4) Indiana State Trademark Dilution; and (5) Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition.

Leave a comment with your email if you’d like a copy of the full Complaint.

Indiana RV Manufacturers Settle Trademark Infringement Case

02 Thursday Jul 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

heartland-bighorn

Indiana RV manufacturers Jayco Inc. (“Jayco”) and Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC (“Heartland”) have jointly announced a settlement of the trademark infringement lawsuit filed earlier in the year by Jayco against Heartland.   The case had been brought in the Northern District of Indiana, Case No. 3:2009-cv-00171.

The suit alleged that Heartland has violated federal trademark law by adopting the Eagle Ridge name for a line of vehicles.  Jayco claims to have held trademark rights in the EAGLE trademark since at least 1991.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, this seemed like a prime settlement opportunity.  Heartland just didn’t have enough investment in the Eagle Ridge mark to justify going forward with potentially expensive trademark litigation.  In a crowded trademark marketplace, you’re bound to have friction from time to time.  It’s nice to see this matter resolve itself before the fireworks began.

Coley Brady, Heartland’s director of sales and marketing, said of the settlement, “Even though Heartland believes its Eagle Ridge line does not infringe upon Jayco’s Eagle trademark, we did not have a significant investment in Eagle Ridge as a name for our fifth-wheel travel trailers. We understand Jayco’s concern and out of respect for Jayco will no longer offer any products bearing the Eagle Ridge name.”

Sid Johnson, director of marketing for Jayco, said, “Jayco has used the Eagle name for nearly 20 years on some of our most popular RV product lines. We are grateful that Heartland is willing to change the name of its new product line to address our concerns in protecting our valuable EAGLE trademark.”

If only every trademark dispute could end so peacefully…

Source: RVBusiness

Building Buzz For Your Online Brand – TechPoint Event 7/10/09

25 Thursday Jun 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

TechPoint LogoJuly 10, 2009 – Building Buzz For Your Online Brand: Trademarks on Twitter, Branding through Blogs, Marketing via MySpace, and other Effective Internet Marketing Strategies

As marketing budgets shrink, sales and marketing professionals are expected to do more with less. Companies large and small are turning to social networking sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and Linkedin, where for little or no money a savvy promoter can reach as many consumers as televison or radio. But what is the real cost? This question and more will be discussed by our panelists.

Speakers:
Julia Gard, Barnes & Thornburg LLP
David Wong, Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Pat Coyle, Coyle Media

Date: July 10, 2009

8:00 a.m. Registration and continental breakfast
8:30 – 9:30 a.m. Presentation

Click here to register.

Hope to see you there!

IURTC Announces New Vice President for Intellectual Property Commercialization

24 Wednesday Jun 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Tech Developments

≈ Leave a comment

MarieKerbeshianThe Indiana University Research and Technology Corporation (IURTC) has named Marie Kerbeshian as vice president for technology commericialization.  She is responsible for IU’s intellectual property and business development activities.  Kerbeshian previously served as executive director and chief executive officer of the University of Virginia Patent Foundation.

IURTC is a not-for-profit agency that facilitates industry–Indiana University research and technology collaborations.  IURTC stimulates growth in Indiana’s technology sectors by helping companies develop commercially viable technology, with the ultimate goal of creating jobs and growing the state’s economy.

Source: Inside Indiana Business

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

  • Advertising Law (1)
  • Artists (23)
  • Authors (20)
  • Bloggers (37)
  • Branding (29)
  • Business Law (9)
  • Copyright (327)
  • Dear KLF Legal (4)
  • Defamation (5)
  • Entertainment Law (14)
  • Estate Law (2)
  • Family Law (2)
  • Fashion (5)
  • Federal Initiatives (33)
  • Indiana (603)
  • Indianapolis (51)
  • Intellectual Property (662)
  • Just for Fun (25)
  • KLF Legal (19)
  • Legislation (34)
  • Litigation (595)
  • Musicians (13)
  • Nonprofit (6)
  • Northern District of Indiana (215)
  • Patent (44)
  • Privacy (15)
  • Right of Publicity (8)
  • Social Media (56)
  • Southern District of Indiana (369)
  • Stories from the Week that Was (42)
  • Supreme Court (13)
  • Tech Developments (119)
  • Trade Dress (26)
  • Trade Secret (15)
  • Trademark (363)
  • What I'm Reading (8)

Bloggers Copyright Federal Initiatives Indiana Indianapolis Intellectual Property Legislation Litigation Northern District of Indiana Patent Social Media Southern District of Indiana Stories from the Week that Was Tech Developments Trademark

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 81 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Indiana Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...